From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L82Fr-0001lU-IA for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:39:43 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A4EF3E05F9; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 00:39:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.hotchilli.net (mta3.th.hotchilli.net [62.89.140.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7810FE05F9 for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 00:39:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from static-87-243-200-80.adsl.hotchilli.net ([87.243.200.80] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by smtp.hotchilli.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1L82Fn-0001zJ-RT for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:39:39 +0000 Message-ID: <493726CA.8080207@shic.co.uk> Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:39:38 +0000 From: Steve User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Curious pattern in log files from ssh... References: <4936E5E3.1040606@shic.co.uk> <58965d8a0812031521o18e02b1cq17ba380a4666084e@mail.gmail.com> <49371C80.9090300@shic.co.uk> <200812031707.23306.dmitry@athabascau.ca> In-Reply-To: <200812031707.23306.dmitry@athabascau.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: e0b5b68b-fe15-4599-9973-0b7f9353d168 X-Archives-Hash: aa4fd522f7e2cbc64f689e1ef0797536 Dmitry S. Makovey wrote: >> Erm - surely I either need to set up my client to port-knock... which >> is a faff I'd rather avoid... in order to use the technique. > nope. just start connection. wait a minute. cancel. start another one. wait a > minute. cancel. start new one - voila! :) > Eeew... especially as this would apply to all connections - even the ones where I have a DSA key. I might be able to cope with this if it only applied to my initial connection, from which I could grab a copy of the DSA key. > well. Nobody but you knows your requiremens and specifics - we're just listing > options. It's up to you to either take 'em or leave 'em ;) Fair enough - but I've still not found an option for sharing/using shared block lists for bot-nets.