From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L5HEI-0007JZ-4x for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 10:02:42 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 155B1E08C6; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 10:02:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com (rv-out-0708.google.com [209.85.198.249]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD5EAE08C6 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 10:02:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b17so417231rvf.46 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 02:02:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ajnisjGbA37J3LtD+0IW3WEQZZqbG/i9y5Vr7nBRifI=; b=FmX675Z5Zazg/GApEdXLI1B5QI7WFUVZyWj8UfsYx7NecZrpurcE81fcKN0dInkQr8 iIjLmUE78n0dvDHnpvz1D+x8kmQNTUScTN0Wz1sIQ7iCFe9XCeIlFI3atbhqYnS0RVmy 1NYmbQhnDIwVGIdrmnD5nxesm3C0QsGVLkNnw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=k0z50kyobcw5HuLHMChUcDx0F4RAe0/jnqwuKSWBcWEyOs34jzeON16q/q0YQ/8CuI 3YIZh8sq4zXqkfLknel70pjd7kiFiSndEVSlORu8TEoUzljMFNMTb69zSzjawBtCI/aB 0UMklj3JThnnqT+PDYadLQKE+6oZER13WAiZI= Received: by 10.140.147.5 with SMTP id u5mr2857751rvd.108.1227693759674; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 02:02:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?4.230.117.167? (dialup-4.230.117.167.Dial1.Houston1.Level3.net [4.230.117.167]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b39sm9261667rvf.0.2008.11.26.02.02.36 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 26 Nov 2008 02:02:38 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <492D1EB9.8000106@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 04:02:33 -0600 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Portage wants KDE4, I don't References: <200811250813.15356.dmitry@athabascau.ca> <492CC71A.6060700@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: cbba536a-dd98-48f6-be86-19411200f6dc X-Archives-Hash: df6a8dfdcba1e1431635374ce903da0d Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > Dale wrote: >> Dmitry S. Makovey wrote: >>> On November 25, 2008, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: >>> >>>> I decided to give portage 2.1.6_rc1 a try. Now it wants to upgrade my >>>> KDE3 to KDE4. I never unmasked or keyworded any KDE4 stuff. Any >>>> options other than removing portage 2.1.6_rc1 again? >>>> >>> 1st of all, I'm running 2.2.x versions of portage and never had KDE4 >>> magically unmasked. You'd better check your setup. I do realize that >>> 2.2.x is not 2.1.6_rc1, but what I mean - it must be either a bug in >>> portage or your setup. Find where the problem originates. Do you >>> have ~arch KDE3 ? I suppose you don't run ~arch branch, right? >> >> I am using portage-2.2_rc15 and I have unstable KDE 3 but nothing KDE >> 4. I actually tested KDE 4 once and had to unmask all the KDE 4 stuff >> to get it. >> >> I agree, there is something fishy about his/her setup. I think that if >> this happened to anyone else, someone would have spoke up by now. I'll >> sync in a little bit and test mine to be sure tho. > > No, not unmasked but keyworded. We've figured it out by now. It was > because KDE4 was getting masked automatically by EAPI2 which stable > portage doesn't support. As soon as portage was upgraded, no masking > anymore due to EAPI and hence KDE4 got pulled-in. > > > Well, I noticed this on mine. I thought I had unmasked KDE 3.5 but after going and looking, I have not. I have portage-2.2_rc16 currently installed and it appears autounmask does not work well with it. This may at some point help the OP but can help me at the moment. How does one unmask ALL the KDE 3 packages but not the KDE 4 stuff? I ask that as in what command would list those to copy to packages.unmask or add them to it. I think whoever writes code for autounmask needs to get a gently nudge. It doesn't seem to like the latest portage. I'm not complaining and I know I am running unstable packages. Just thinking he may not know that his code just got borked. :-O I eagerly await the day one can keyword/unmask kde-meta and it automatically unmasks all its friends. I'm not sure how good that day will be but it is a thought. Dale :-) :-)