From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L3LIW-0007N9-JY for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 01:59:04 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E409BE0566; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 01:59:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.173]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF7FCE0566 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 01:59:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 29so853621wff.10 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:59:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=P/XzsLLVhVgu8jsyOIA8bspnjMikghs+U9omtaJ9Mps=; b=tEe8QQi2oqY12COwWIE7uVB6+XG+FkHBOfagyZO7THehDZ0238lOVde7uq8Axh6ExC B2mqfwJfJ4xga7iCcysEVcsoH4NVNmtXKbJPxK7uFG4t2lq6tGUjb78qjQqFz4pkjrnm E/pmNKGl/LqbBGqG4cbPUGz43qcIEojqEnCtg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=FSTv7jYSfuO1dgo9q37LWY01dt1HLdxd7DFtox4B7O5/XBbQyWrxjBSNM4FD9nRIvN rxQlW4rtDZL7AgTvPrZVMMiZek5Td012IN/SowGPLdtRX8dA1gsOaZy/6Vxjs8d+XxKi nC4zy3f9ze3VKwXmlW8oPVSj1ZjkbG9pWJVXM= Received: by 10.142.100.1 with SMTP id x1mr1475912wfb.119.1227232742634; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:59:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?4.230.99.227? (dialup-4.230.99.227.Dial1.Houston1.Level3.net [4.230.99.227]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 24sm2168346wff.37.2008.11.20.17.59.00 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:59:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <492615DF.9000006@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 19:58:55 -0600 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.17) Gecko/20081110 SeaMonkey/1.1.12 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Random segfaults with kernel 2.6.27 References: <350fc7cf0811201707y638930ddy4f2cc9bd4caabab7@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 61fa93cc-d0fc-4a3c-91fa-2bba786df3b6 X-Archives-Hash: a5d1d095d69483765a3c0a28b45c3080 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > Andrey Falko wrote: > >> When I had the symptoms you described, it turned out that my RAM >> voltage needed to be raised in the BIOS. > > Hmm. My system *is* overclocked (I'm one of those "enthusiast" guys). > I'm running an E6600 that runs 2.4GHz stock at 3GHz with a good > aftermarket cooler (temps never go above 48C at full load). The CPU > is overclocked and *undervoltaged* (1.29V from its 1.35V stock). The > RAM is both underclocked (to get an FSB:DRAM ratio of 1:1) and > undervoltaged. The system has been confirmed stable though; 8 hours > Prime95 stress test with no errors, which is much more of a stress > test than any real application can pull off. It also passes memtest. > I used to overclock some too until I started running folding. Folding just doesn't like overclocking. I'm not sure what prime95 does but it could still be a problem even though it passes. Just a thought. Your Mileage May Vary. Dale :-) :-)