From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L0OW7-00021n-Ip for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:49:00 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6DF78E0417; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:48:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.188]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A806E0417 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:48:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 18so738167fks.2 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 14:48:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type; bh=aK3yuxynwe0eu6U5h0G/TivXORHaDJHj0cYspo8CX40=; b=pbEKAcdNy7S+UY3NKJfK8Q3sb5NROw6HEXluLudLveSoxyOp604PJYMtwLapFsH7yn 2sxCFdETjQ49Pe9aVUX5W401ZmBWm0NJcj2S+fB9hhe6Uxti6t+9JwrqlzfrPr0oDNzG Wq5QraoL8OIYF+J4fM8HxjaTUKZSNDranebv4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type; b=UBrVl3lPlK6s8XBeRBZ42nkJmTGsKakiEkyZx+xOAy6i2HSuB+TnRUWG8FiPduPNlU 8nglNqg0VgmPsl73yk8dr+zsqelxCymDZiz/kSIfVvh84BcZFa+l1AmuIzxD3MJf5MpE AM+mr1uWrDz3D+NQJ7/yQ9QkLvmQTwo281PHY= Received: by 10.180.216.19 with SMTP id o19mr2999548bkg.54.1226530130831; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 14:48:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.0.2? ([94.216.8.98]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d13sm4490731fka.19.2008.11.12.14.48.48 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 12 Nov 2008 14:48:49 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <491B5D4E.40608@googlemail.com> Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 23:48:46 +0100 From: Daniel Pielmeier User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080928) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is equery depends still viable References: <87prl0n21n.fsf@newsguy.com> <200811122312.32111.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> <87abc4mupp.fsf@newsguy.com> In-Reply-To: <87abc4mupp.fsf@newsguy.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 OpenPGP: id=215AD14D Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigFB1ED422F8A89960D675987C" X-Archives-Salt: 7a6dc7f6-2569-498d-9f33-0caeb1a65a4c X-Archives-Hash: 52804306550596e03a6de28f561f4b08 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigFB1ED422F8A89960D675987C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Harry Putnam schrieb am 12.11.2008 23:43: > Alan McKinnon writes: >=20 >> On Wednesday 12 November 2008 22:04:52 Harry Putnam wrote: >>> With recent changes in portage in the last few mnths, is equery in >>> general and `equery depends' in particular still reliable? >> I use it fairly often still, but do notice I get a lot of null >> output. So I no longer trust it fully. At least it doesn't give >> false positives - what's in the putput really is a valid depend. >=20 > Do you know off hand if there are any alternatives? >=20 >=20 >=20 emerge -pv --depclean atom --------------enigFB1ED422F8A89960D675987C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkkbXU4ACgkQlcuUeyFa0U1YvQCgzb4x1RWN6HeWNLd8R2NrFTuC DUAAoJN4udMGV6w4WHwrsvm/JdcPm2hJ =ipeD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigFB1ED422F8A89960D675987C--