From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KvxmO-0004qJ-Bb for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:27:24 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 25038E03F5; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:27:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from static.21.48.46.78.clients.your-server.de (static.21.48.46.78.clients.your-server.de [78.46.48.21]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1334E03F5 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:27:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by static.21.48.46.78.clients.your-server.de (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 1D4D39DC718; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 18:27:29 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.1 (2007-05-02) on 0815-web.localdomain X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,NO_RECEIVED, NO_RELAYS,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham version=3.2.1 Message-ID: <490B3FF8.4020102@j-schmitz.net> Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 18:27:20 +0100 From: Justin User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20081020) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] How to know when a package is due to go stable? References: <0aea01c93b56$c3388fe0$a500a8c0@quan> In-Reply-To: <0aea01c93b56$c3388fe0$a500a8c0@quan> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig9CAEA4F42760DF7FE2AD4017" X-Archives-Salt: 4648b761-c9b1-4eb0-825f-5ba1e80ec43a X-Archives-Hash: ccd018ee148712afa3dffe20121e7eb9 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig9CAEA4F42760DF7FE2AD4017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable James Homuth schrieb: > There are several packages that were thrown around on the list, or vers= ions > of packages, that I've come across that I figure I might want to take a= n > active interest in. However, to avoid sending my boxes into a tailspin,= I'm > staying away from installing the still in development versions. What I'= d > like to know though is if there's some means of knowing if/when, as an > example, a newer version of Portage is supposed to be considered stable= =2E If > not then I can always keep an eye on the relevant RSS feeds, but it was= > mostly just curiosity on my part. Thanks either way. > > James > > > =20 eix -uc --------------enig9CAEA4F42760DF7FE2AD4017 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkkLP/gACgkQgAnW8HDreRbefgCguvHikL5tBJRO0oEgk9NQVn3h d8IAn2aO+2P1ZQ6pgMXS5jk2EXWOcgN8 =o57s -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig9CAEA4F42760DF7FE2AD4017--