[gentoo-user] How to know when a package is due to go stable?

[gentoo-user] How to know when a package is due to go stable?

[James Homuth]

There are several packages that were thrown around on the list, or versions
of packages, that I've come across that I figure I might want to take an
active interest in. However, to avoid sending my boxes into a tailspin, I'm
staying away from installing the still in development versions. What I'd
like to know though is if there's some means of knowing if/when, as an
example, a newer version of Portage is supposed to be considered stable. If
not then I can always keep an eye on the relevant RSS feeds, but it was
mostly just curiosity on my part. Thanks either way.

James

Re: [gentoo-user] How to know when a package is due to go stable?

[Justin]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 756 bytes --]

James Homuth schrieb:
> There are several packages that were thrown around on the list, or versions
> of packages, that I've come across that I figure I might want to take an
> active interest in. However, to avoid sending my boxes into a tailspin, I'm
> staying away from installing the still in development versions. What I'd
> like to know though is if there's some means of knowing if/when, as an
> example, a newer version of Portage is supposed to be considered stable. If
> not then I can always keep an eye on the relevant RSS feeds, but it was
> mostly just curiosity on my part. Thanks either way.
>
> James
>
>
>   
Quite easy,

emerge --sync
emerge -up world system,

then you know whats gone stable with higher versions.


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] How to know when a package is due to go stable?

[Iain Buchanan]

James Homuth wrote:
> There are several packages that were thrown around on the list, or versions
> of packages, that I've come across that I figure I might want to take an
> active interest in. However, to avoid sending my boxes into a tailspin, I'm
> staying away from installing the still in development versions.

in development according to whom?

> What I'd
> like to know though is if there's some means of knowing if/when, as an
> example, a newer version of Portage is supposed to be considered stable.

So long as you have ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=x86 (or any arch, but not ~arch) 
then it's gentoo stable.  Generally this means no (or insignificant) 
bugs for about 30 days, and no unstable / masked deps.

Note this has nothing to do with upstream stable, which is defined by 
upstream.

Given the keywords above, if you can install it, it's considered stable!

> If
> not then I can always keep an eye on the relevant RSS feeds, but it was
> mostly just curiosity on my part. Thanks either way.

worthwhile for getting juicy info like --keep-going but otherwise not 
really necessary.

-- 
Iain Buchanan <iaindb at netspace dot net dot au>

Alea iacta est.
	[The die is cast]
		-- Gaius Julius Caesar

[gentoo-user] Re: How to know when a package is due to go stable?

[Nikos Chantziaras]

Justin wrote:
> James Homuth schrieb:
>> There are several packages that were thrown around on the list, or versions
>> of packages, that I've come across that I figure I might want to take an
>> active interest in. However, to avoid sending my boxes into a tailspin, I'm
>> staying away from installing the still in development versions. What I'd
>> like to know though is if there's some means of knowing if/when, as an
>> example, a newer version of Portage is supposed to be considered stable. If
>> not then I can always keep an eye on the relevant RSS feeds, but it was
>> mostly just curiosity on my part. Thanks either way.
>>
>> James
>>
>>
>>   
> Quite easy,
> 
> emerge --sync
> emerge -up world system,
> 
> then you know whats gone stable with higher versions.

Or, to also cover packages not in world/system, you can do:

emerge -p1u `qlist -IC`

(Don't omit the "1" from the options or you'll mess up your world file 
with packages that are purely dependencies.)

I wonder why emerge doesn't do something like this by default, actually. 
  Say a package has a serious exploit and an update was made.  If the 
package isn't in world, emerge will never grab the update.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How to know when a package is due to go stable?

[Neil Bothwick]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 431 bytes --]

On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 16:37:58 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:

> I wonder why emerge doesn't do something like this by default,
> actually. Say a package has a serious exploit and an update was made.
> If the package isn't in world, emerge will never grab the update.

If it's not is world, or a dependency of a world package, it's not needed
and --depclean will catch it.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

IBM - I Blame Microsoft

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

[gentoo-user] Re: How to know when a package is due to go stable?

[Nikos Chantziaras]

Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 16:37:58 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> 
>> I wonder why emerge doesn't do something like this by default,
>> actually. Say a package has a serious exploit and an update was made.
>> If the package isn't in world, emerge will never grab the update.
> 
> If it's not is world, or a dependency of a world package, it's not needed
> and --depclean will catch it.

No, it will not :P  Don't ask me why, because I don't know.  I only know 
from experience that --depclean does not catch some packages that get 
updated with "emerge -1u `qlist -IC`" (and don't get updated with 
"emerge -uD world system").

RE: [gentoo-user] Re: How to know when a package is due to go stable?

[James Homuth]

 

-----Original Message-----
From: news [mailto:news@ger.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Nikos Chantziaras
Sent: October 31, 2008 10:38 AM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: How to know when a package is due to go stable?

Justin wrote:
> James Homuth schrieb:
>> There are several packages that were thrown around on the list, or 
>> versions of packages, that I've come across that I figure I might 
>> want to take an active interest in. However, to avoid sending my 
>> boxes into a tailspin, I'm staying away from installing the still in 
>> development versions. What I'd like to know though is if there's some 
>> means of knowing if/when, as an example, a newer version of Portage 
>> is supposed to be considered stable. If not then I can always keep an 
>> eye on the relevant RSS feeds, but it was mostly just curiosity on my
part. Thanks either way.
>>
>> James
>>
>>
>>   
> Quite easy,
> 
> emerge --sync
> emerge -up world system,
> 
> then you know whats gone stable with higher versions.

Or, to also cover packages not in world/system, you can do:

emerge -p1u `qlist -IC`

(Don't omit the "1" from the options or you'll mess up your world file with
packages that are purely dependencies.)

I wonder why emerge doesn't do something like this by default, actually. 
  Say a package has a serious exploit and an update was made.  If the
package isn't in world, emerge will never grab the update.


That'll teach me to just read the Gentoo documentation. I figured emerge
--update --deep world covered system, too.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How to know when a package is due to go stable?

[Dale]

James Homuth wrote:
>
>
> That'll teach me to just read the Gentoo documentation. I figured emerge
> --update --deep world covered system, too.
>
>
>
>   

As far as what I was told on -dev, it still does.  If you use the
@system or @world, then that is a different thing.  I'm assuming what I
was told still holds true. 

Dale

:-)  :-) 

P.S.  Yea, I'm back.  I had a reaction to some meds and they dang near
killed me.  Spent about a week in the hospital wondering what that light
was.  o_O 

Re: [gentoo-user] How to know when a package is due to go stable?

[Justin]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 652 bytes --]

James Homuth schrieb:
> There are several packages that were thrown around on the list, or versions
> of packages, that I've come across that I figure I might want to take an
> active interest in. However, to avoid sending my boxes into a tailspin, I'm
> staying away from installing the still in development versions. What I'd
> like to know though is if there's some means of knowing if/when, as an
> example, a newer version of Portage is supposed to be considered stable. If
> not then I can always keep an eye on the relevant RSS feeds, but it was
> mostly just curiosity on my part. Thanks either way.
>
> James
>
>
>   
eix -uc


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How to know when a package is due to go stable?

[Neil Bothwick]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 597 bytes --]

On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 18:11:20 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:

> > If it's not is world, or a dependency of a world package, it's not
> > needed and --depclean will catch it.  
> 
> No, it will not :P  Don't ask me why, because I don't know.  I only
> know from experience that --depclean does not catch some packages that
> get updated with "emerge -1u `qlist -IC`" (and don't get updated with 
> "emerge -uD world system").

Possibly build time dependencies, which aren't updated unless you use
--with-bdeps y.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

There's too much blood in my caffeine system.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]