From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13B89158041 for ; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 15:09:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 873C6E2A2F; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 15:08:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost01c.sbp.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost01c.sbp.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.1.5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECD3DE2A18 for ; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 15:08:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.69.80.10] (helo=cube.localnet) by smarthost01c.sbp.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1ro2zQ-00BoLy-FM for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 15:08:56 +0000 From: Peter Humphrey To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] New profiles 23.0 Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 15:08:56 +0000 Message-ID: <4909823.31r3eYUQgx@cube> In-Reply-To: <5768289.DvuYhMxLoT@cube> References: <5768289.DvuYhMxLoT@cube> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Originating-smarthost01c-IP: [82.69.80.10] Feedback-ID: 82.69.80.10 X-Archives-Salt: ce87046c-01c0-491c-a3a8-a21b22606753 X-Archives-Hash: 899a8a3a100cbb413773900166d67e4a On Saturday, 23 March 2024 14:59:15 GMT Peter Humphrey wrote: > Hello list, > > Has anyone tried the profile upgrade that was notified today? I tried it > just now on a small rescue system and it failed on installing the first > binary package, complaining that my disk layout was split-usr. > > My /var is on a separate partition, for easy of file recovery, but /usr is > not. Is this the cause of the problem? Please ignore that. Three seconds later I realised what I should have done: run emerge-usr first. -- Regards, Peter.