From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85D7813800E for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 17:59:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F1C0AE07A1; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 17:59:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com (mail-bk0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F2A7E05F2 for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 17:58:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkwj4 with SMTP id j4so4278732bkw.40 for ; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 10:58:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=Ntjl81mg4MJjH8QWlEB22IRX9m6Mum7lkzHgm448PYI=; b=06ajLJ+c/+FtfdptME/m7z8Pr5Ar4iBkUcjaZLBr5t2LjPZhXp2875O++hm52owB5V UTOPZ21OwB0RhH5QlLtiJZZA/gX3HZnmB1LIu1uj8pJ8deQZyx3BEZMAqmZLLxlHKC/P mU6asHN7fjMvEqFbWU8OucPzAfYU7S2E4jO3mWkPKkplww6icexgV4aV8xUPYHcj3mhn zGiAt7mVTs63aIJvLEKccRSrPeyWljDPZQoVrE+7BuEqiZRlftmngUhsR2E3sdVyydji ppKi3ga4fsdL840EwcEzu50RCnmjXjCk2Ti51nnXBfjR0KvSG7sSHJ4gsvg7/gfohjzm jywQ== Received: by 10.205.120.18 with SMTP id fw18mr7358942bkc.64.1343843884331; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 10:58:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localnet (p4FC612E9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [79.198.18.233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gq2sm2169952bkc.13.2012.08.01.10.58.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 01 Aug 2012 10:58:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Volker Armin Hemmann To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Cc: Daniel Petre Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] new machine : proposed design Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 19:57:55 +0200 Message-ID: <4907726.p1P3XsEzEE@localhost> User-Agent: KMail/4.9 rc2 (Linux/3.2.24; KDE/4.8.97; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20120801053339.GB22672@ip6.ro> References: <20120801034734.GB2882@ca.inter.net> <20120801053339.GB22672@ip6.ro> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Archives-Salt: 38a74d73-467c-4852-91f0-bb7e4c200d7f X-Archives-Hash: 4ad3d89f499a4dead64751ca310953fe Am Mittwoch, 1. August 2012, 08:33:39 schrieb Daniel Petre: > On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 07:25:10AM +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > Eithout looking it up.... With that prize the case is crap. The psu even > > more so. And Kingston....ugh... noname quality.... > > actually ValueRam is pretty decent, i ran ddr2 modules in some old machines > without problems in the last years, also i remember using HyperX ddr2 on > non *nix computers flawless in office work. sadly: no. Kingston is unable to program SPDeeproms correctly and with every ValueRam stick you will get another type of chips. Oh - and their quality checks suck. Kingston is way too expensive for their low quality products. You can just buy some cheapo 'almost' noname brand and get better results. And the SSD - seriously? Get OCZ or Samsung. Kingston is just rebranding one of those. Just with lesser probability of bug fixing firmware updates and much worse customer support. -- #163933