From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [69.77.167.62] (helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KngJl-0005cG-WD for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2008 21:11:38 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B9110E06A3; Wed, 8 Oct 2008 21:11:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from aa011msr.fastwebnet.it (aa011msr.fastwebnet.it [85.18.95.71]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D782E06A3 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2008 21:11:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [37.1.3.90] (37.1.3.90) by aa011msr.fastwebnet.it (8.0.013.8) (authenticated as cyclopia) id 48D8459E02B75DAD for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 8 Oct 2008 23:11:30 +0200 Message-ID: <48ED2612.3020903@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 23:28:50 +0200 From: "b.n." User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20081008) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 4.1.2... a winner! References: <200810051210.49096.mcbrides9@comcast.net> <20081007195658.GA21106@eriks> <48ECF089.1050208@gmail.com> <200810082048.40053.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200810082048.40053.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 6ac18624-b89b-4f9a-965b-9aeb1335bb91 X-Archives-Hash: a2dcd362be9c8f0c3965bb9023afec4a Alan McKinnon ha scritto: > On Wednesday 08 October 2008 19:40:25 b.n. wrote: >> Erik Hahn ha scritto: >>> On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 11:13:33PM +0400, Andrew Gaydenko wrote: >>>> I have found another KDE app which is important sufficiently to delay >>>> switching to KDE4 - the app is k3b, which still isn't ported. If I >>>> understand well, there isn't any minimal apps list (and k3b, would be in >>>> the list, I think) which must be ported to KDE4 before unmasking KDE4 in >>>> portage. Is it so? >>> Why should there be one? The fact k3b isn't ported yet doesn't break any >>> other KDE package. >> Does k3b 3.5 run happily under kde4? >> If yes, there is no problem. >> If not, there is. > > That question is irrelevant. It should be: > > If k3b is ported to KDE4, then it will use the kde4 libs > If not, the ebuild will emerge the kde3 libs and k3b will use those. > > Either way, there is no problem. I know that *in theory* it is so. In practice however, someone in this thread has said that for example kopete suffers incompatibilities. Maybe I have not understood correctly ; however that's why I asked. m.