From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Nq4rL-0004Gi-P5 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:25:00 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4AD86E0A5F; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:24:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f219.google.com (mail-bw0-f219.google.com [209.85.218.219]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07476E0A5F for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:24:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz19 with SMTP id 19so1070623bwz.26 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 05:24:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=SB7VMK+RnOGuS4rgWI54WUmgt+RhY7Dn7z/QkxYizZw=; b=HLf/IzMNoaRQPan6DnrX4KM3BTdYEtiKQG+qQwWWo2mifZaKHovPaWpEp6BX4FXkcb pkKxUYw7iS+Wis/JOg0qQKxMoQaCEge+bbuuaLiuPt5Hz0Y5Yv1TxHVFxSgYG9Hv8KQ7 CYRbpFUOGFwogx99ksrpH7WNN9U43GA4eykLs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=C2muTapfAqzRtotIKnxvGsV7oSbOoeQGHAFOuywhxEYGD4gc/275grAvYtYSfcIT8F rAeCAu2qgql0bahJzCF5hsOxuVzb+jYNtztWUqzNos5hIDkgraYXWC959UDaYCcTyvbx 8yXOjkMtnNTPS5rUQKSmy91bBpCoNd4MZL+Nc= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.48.209 with SMTP id s17mr2237735bkf.88.1268400251372; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 05:24:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <47a330c51003100028w11a44a61pdcba1e0b41c5cb5c@mail.gmail.com> <47a330c51003110703x4a891508ib2a38ed3afff9ac6@mail.gmail.com> <5bdc1c8b1003110751h28866137j3c20e69dceb99a61@mail.gmail.com> <47a330c51003120005q2c7dda47w286d340387e4fa11@mail.gmail.com> <47a330c51003120034x4e9037feld530642989da5191@mail.gmail.com> From: Damian Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:23:51 +0100 Message-ID: <47a330c51003120523n61a9d94dq58d132c50e1fae00@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Only two people in the gentoo world is having this problem? To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: e64486d5-e70e-449a-8288-ec796597ef43 X-Archives-Hash: 2777a4a96dd02d8c5e43c932f368bdc0 Hi Arttu, >> Ok, so moving the file, reinstalling libarchive, and running >> lafilefixer didn't change the situation. >> >> So I'm using gvfs without the archive flag. > > Bummer. Are you sure your libarchive.la is not another orphan, just > like liblzmadec.la was? Indeed. libarchive.la is not owned by any package. Is this a symptom of a bigger problem? > Please check (if you are still interested in hunting down the cause). Sure, and I really appreciate the gentoo community help. > You should probably only end up with that la file if you have > USE="static-libs" for libarchive -- which (if I'm reading correctly > the paludis output attached in the bug) you do not have currently > enabled. That's correct. Should I enable static-libs and recompile libarchive? > But since you have the libarchive.la file on your system you may have > had the USE flag enabled at one point, or the ebuild may have changed > to allow separate dynamic and static building while your package > manager might not have kept up with its records. Ok, if that's the case I will report it to the paludis developers. > So, also check the owner of libarchive.la, and clean up if necessary. Ok, I just moved the library to the trash. What I don't understand is how to orphaned la files can cause compilation failures. Thanks, Damian.