From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-108839-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>) id 1Npzsz-0006dD-E9 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:06:22 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 51F42E0C9B; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:06:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f219.google.com (mail-bw0-f219.google.com [209.85.218.219]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 119CAE0C9F for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:06:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz19 with SMTP id 19so844863bwz.26 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:06:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=jU2zKuMxugA+ggN0NgEtz4d1SEF9BK/Owlga6Y2p4ZA=; b=udg+FEN5vY8eUbqs1nPh+ejE8icChrsXCtGL3BVh5mrxTaTk5ed5FwRxhIDNCxrZJp NA5KR3zYESu1j7+kPEWc9Wjh1UE16+JTZ4ELPihazdNUzrhb53iLBiGnM1jOXyl5ywhq rcJpwBJW9v4ROFgJytqTwasDVs2enBTq1pCe8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=MitfvdieEY54hMAjTK0m6HQrAEhJFOtSzL1wRyi3q/qC/lAixk/czLYFSr1zZcnmCO MIudoouAsJFb+xYK0iQIbtyW5jGuyr446PbULMFcCbwm5V6WM14KZZqZhvzgLOuqIVC8 +Zq8COXXUBGmuBvwD8UBEV/HOL7JvKnrnE9kI= Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.10.9 with SMTP id n9mr703770bkn.41.1268381171290; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:06:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <fecdbac61003111339l3ccbadf0rd3de1ebd6db7fb3@mail.gmail.com> References: <47a330c51003100028w11a44a61pdcba1e0b41c5cb5c@mail.gmail.com> <fecdbac61003101258s4dd9e199w8210cb37a252baa4@mail.gmail.com> <47a330c51003110703x4a891508ib2a38ed3afff9ac6@mail.gmail.com> <5bdc1c8b1003110751h28866137j3c20e69dceb99a61@mail.gmail.com> <fecdbac61003111339l3ccbadf0rd3de1ebd6db7fb3@mail.gmail.com> From: Damian <damian.only@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:05:51 +0100 Message-ID: <47a330c51003120005q2c7dda47w286d340387e4fa11@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Only two people in the gentoo world is having this problem? To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: 96e81709-107a-4df7-9ce8-c006d3b203f2 X-Archives-Hash: 4707a5cf1aa7bf9b49f719cdba541eff > Anyway, if it were me I'd nuke the file in a heartbeat, but if OP is > too timid for that, he can also quarantine the file first, i.e., move > it to some other path where it won't cause trouble (and then delete > later). Also, (from the bug) his libarchive.la seems to still list the > .la, so he should re-emerge libarchive after moving away the orphaned > .la-file (or use lafilefixer?). Ok, the OP will try this. If I cannot fix it I will just install gvfs without the archive flag. > Still, there is something funny with paludis, as so many people using > it seem to have so many problems with orphaned libtool archive files. > Ahem, even the warning from exherbo front page is gone nowadays. Is it > production quality now? o.O Actually, it is the first problem I have with .la files using paludis, but I don't know about other people's experience. Thanks a lot for your help, Damian.