From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-108768-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1NpMrN-0003lL-6l
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:26:05 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 38363E09D4;
	Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:25:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-bw0-f219.google.com (mail-bw0-f219.google.com [209.85.218.219])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE97FE09D4
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:25:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by bwz19 with SMTP id 19so1872554bwz.26
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 06:25:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=ZAhinBRN5RjAOkxoKNqj8M6I5c4DFyZVdMUX85z6eII=;
        b=c1F/CmJcPPSC4Q35MPYZ9NkN9rezzx+aSJLp6E+xW8uwkJmKaxV4QsSSLzp4aExLsR
         fN+weKTjGK3AlL2OCl3hKodkQfO7kz3y76JjLILDjI4CCh6yJxR5Vl4Abwbaqfcfaz/1
         DoVLzlu7wi/k+bYBQ/s9uQdBUNZo6Ti20YjTw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=N/VIVvh8xAlycu7b1hHctsi0vbgTetLNwol4wHE9k+GGTqObjpk4J+ig9GfAjPb8KC
         1vZA+53kIIBMkgjdv2Uu/irOIGDRHe/GWBQOIzB/G8+RvTmMnjGTQimAXiXCTgFTNPSx
         XoyMxpfG0Y4aNfcDDRyYdLFCV5ydcNEOSip/E=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.20.77 with SMTP id e13mr1761929bkb.163.1268231139224; Wed, 
	10 Mar 2010 06:25:39 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <5bdc1c8b1003100610m781eb1c7o1e0fd8f0528cebac@mail.gmail.com>
References: <47a330c51003100028w11a44a61pdcba1e0b41c5cb5c@mail.gmail.com> 
	<5bdc1c8b1003100502t2672d7b8y2228f1837149c1ad@mail.gmail.com> 
	<47a330c51003100605q163c1b11q7223ee771f8a2200@mail.gmail.com> 
	<5bdc1c8b1003100610m781eb1c7o1e0fd8f0528cebac@mail.gmail.com>
From: Damian <damian.only@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:25:19 +0100
Message-ID: <47a330c51003100625w758c5273y354dd57d77fa3d69@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Only two people in the gentoo world is having this 
	problem?
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: d6f54191-eb9f-4796-9a65-4dda59b13df6
X-Archives-Hash: 9d0a483f1ce3a0c0601150953beca432

On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 6:05 AM, Damian <damian.only@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com> wrot=
e:
>>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Damian <damian.only@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> While ago I reported a bug regarding gvfs:
>>>> =A0 =A0https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D302196
>>>>
>>>> It's been unresolved for quite a long time now, so I was wondering if
>>>> somebody could give me a hint on how to solve this problem.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Damian.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ??
>>>
>>> revdep-rebuild -ip
>> I already tried (reconcilio actually), and didn't solve the problem:
>> it tries to rebuild gvfs, failing miserably again.
>>
>
> I saw that in the bug report. If you want to keep going down the path
> of what didn't work then do nothing. Potentially revdep-rebuild finds
> something else.
>
> You need to post some results. I've seen gvfs fail due to flag
> settings. How would anyone here make a reasoned response with so
> little data?
Actually the flag plays no role. Since I compiled the package again
with the original flags and I got the same results. I honestly don't
know which (other) relevant data I can provide.

I didn't intend to make anybody upset with my email, or with the
mention to the word paludis.