From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JjCrM-00085a-GK for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 08 Apr 2008 12:23:32 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 95F19E0700; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 12:21:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmailhost01.isp.att.net (fmailhost01.isp.att.net [207.115.11.51]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62D4BE0700 for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 12:21:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [216.78.70.226] (host-216-78-70-226.jan.bellsouth.net[216.78.70.226]) by isp.att.net (frfwmhc01) with ESMTP id <20080408122125H0100n1i84e>; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 12:21:25 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [216.78.70.226] Message-ID: <47FB6344.908@bellsouth.net> Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 07:21:24 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.13) Gecko/20080328 SeaMonkey/1.1.9 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: Re: "emerge -DuvatN world" doesn't show all upgradeable packages References: <2577300.OLZLf1hHOn@schmarck.cn> <20080408114222.3b20ee68@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> <2803327.OFUh12OAy1@schmarck.cn> <200804081319.38020.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> <47FB5A86.3080203@konstantinhansen.de> <1566101.v0SWn9PpeM@schmarck.cn> <47FB604A.5080800@bellsouth.net> <47FB624A.2040700@anferny.ath.cx> In-Reply-To: <47FB624A.2040700@anferny.ath.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: c587ab41-8bfa-4e09-8493-adfc6b42cd3a X-Archives-Hash: fe023e5dd4d0dc259539111bb0d5dcf9 Anthony Metcalf wrote: > Dale wrote: >> >> It's been a while but make sure you have switched to the new gcc and >> it is working fine before removing the old one. Nothing worse than >> removing gcc then finding out the new one isn't . . . functional. >> Sort of fun to fix. >> >> Dale >> >> :-) :-) > > Tell me about it! > > Hint: Don't then unpack a stage 3 tarball in / to get a working gcc > back...... > True. That would work but I would be doing a fresh install. I suspect there would be a few orphaned files around after that. Still best to 'test the waters' before diving in on such a critical package. I don't usually remove mine until all my packages have been rebuilt, just to make sure. Dale :-) :-) -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list