From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ji2oW-0007A6-CI for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 05 Apr 2008 07:27:48 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 929F9E053C; Sat, 5 Apr 2008 07:27:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E91CE053C for ; Sat, 5 Apr 2008 07:27:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.22.10] (ip68-4-152-120.oc.oc.cox.net [68.4.152.120]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFAF666C0B for ; Sat, 5 Apr 2008 07:27:45 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <47F72A14.8060208@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2008 00:28:20 -0700 From: Zac Medico User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080213) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --depclean -p output looks weird References: <47F71BDB.5030701@bellsouth.net> In-Reply-To: <47F71BDB.5030701@bellsouth.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: a9833e58-577f-43a0-ab19-0dadbeba50f2 X-Archives-Hash: 01e52f518d2d7a6adcc1d5f16eda9b58 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dale wrote: > Calculating dependencies... done! > > >>>> These are the packages that would be unmerged: > > sys-kernel/gentoo-sources > selected: 2.6.23-r8 > protected: none > omitted: 2.6.23-r3 2.6.24-r4 > > sys-kernel/gentoo-sources > selected: 2.6.23-r9 > protected: none > omitted: 2.6.23-r3 2.6.24-r4 > > sys-kernel/gentoo-sources > selected: 2.6.24-r3 > protected: none > omitted: 2.6.23-r3 2.6.24-r4 > [snip] > What looks weird you ask, why is it listing them that way? They are > separately listed and I don't recall ever seeing it listed that way > before. They are usually in one section. That's a side effect from the fix for this bug: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201045 The code was never written to preserve unmerge order, but now that it's been tweaked to do so, it displays a bit differently in cases like this. It would be possible to make it look like it used to in cases when the order doesn't matter, but since it's only superficial, it's not a really a high priority. > Another odd thing is this: > > root@smoker / # uname -r > 2.6.23-gentoo-r8 > root@smoker / # ls -al /usr/src/ > total 3 > drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 176 2008-04-04 16:58 . > drwxr-xr-x 17 root root 496 2008-01-23 09:31 .. > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 2006-08-03 09:23 .keep > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 32 2008-04-04 16:58 linux -> > /usr/src/linux-2.6.23-gentoo-r8/ > drwxr-xr-x 20 root root 1424 2008-04-04 17:21 linux-2.6.23-gentoo-r8 > drwxr-xr-x 21 root root 1472 2008-04-03 22:32 linux-2.6.24-gentoo-r4 > root@smoker / # > > It wants to remove the currently running kernel as well. Seems it used > to leave that one in the past. I may be wrong tho. That's this bug: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198200 With