From: Zac Medico <zmedico@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --depclean -p output looks weird
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2008 00:28:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47F72A14.8060208@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47F71BDB.5030701@bellsouth.net>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Dale wrote:
> Calculating dependencies... done!
>
>
>>>> These are the packages that would be unmerged:
>
> sys-kernel/gentoo-sources
> selected: 2.6.23-r8
> protected: none
> omitted: 2.6.23-r3 2.6.24-r4
>
> sys-kernel/gentoo-sources
> selected: 2.6.23-r9
> protected: none
> omitted: 2.6.23-r3 2.6.24-r4
>
> sys-kernel/gentoo-sources
> selected: 2.6.24-r3
> protected: none
> omitted: 2.6.23-r3 2.6.24-r4
>
[snip]
> What looks weird you ask, why is it listing them that way? They are
> separately listed and I don't recall ever seeing it listed that way
> before. They are usually in one section.
That's a side effect from the fix for this bug:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201045
The code was never written to preserve unmerge order, but now that
it's been tweaked to do so, it displays a bit differently in cases
like this. It would be possible to make it look like it used to in
cases when the order doesn't matter, but since it's only
superficial, it's not a really a high priority.
> Another odd thing is this:
>
> root@smoker / # uname -r
> 2.6.23-gentoo-r8
> root@smoker / # ls -al /usr/src/
> total 3
> drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 176 2008-04-04 16:58 .
> drwxr-xr-x 17 root root 496 2008-01-23 09:31 ..
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 2006-08-03 09:23 .keep
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 32 2008-04-04 16:58 linux ->
> /usr/src/linux-2.6.23-gentoo-r8/
> drwxr-xr-x 20 root root 1424 2008-04-04 17:21 linux-2.6.23-gentoo-r8
> drwxr-xr-x 21 root root 1472 2008-04-03 22:32 linux-2.6.24-gentoo-r4
> root@smoker / #
>
> It wants to remove the currently running kernel as well. Seems it used
> to leave that one in the past. I may be wrong tho.
That's this bug:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198200
With <portage-2.2_pre the only solution is to add the versions that
you want to keep to the world file, like this:
emerge --noreplace =gentoo-sources-2.6.23-r8
After you do that, depclean shouldn't want to remove that one.
Zac
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkf3KhMACgkQ/ejvha5XGaNLHwCeKY/EGULFLrcTknYIs59ZzXBH
EfcAn2GeHj7uhyMW/70YUIKOyn64xr7s
=yDS1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-05 7:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-05 6:27 [gentoo-user] emerge --depclean -p output looks weird Dale
2008-04-05 7:28 ` Zac Medico [this message]
2008-04-05 8:28 ` Dale
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47F72A14.8060208@gentoo.org \
--to=zmedico@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox