From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-77334-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1Jd8DW-0000m9-JG
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 18:13:18 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B7E28E0789;
	Sat, 22 Mar 2008 18:13:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from india533.server4you.de (india533.server4you.de [85.25.151.41])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8825DE0789
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 18:13:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.0.17] (pD95FF949.dip.t-dialin.net [217.95.249.73])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by india533.server4you.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E576F7706AA
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 19:13:15 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <47E54C40.7000708@smash-net.org>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 19:13:20 +0100
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Norman_Rie=DF?= <norman@smash-net.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080229)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] AMD vs. Intel on Gentoo?
References: <49bf44f10803221007v27627160xa0b0daadc4bcc0ff@mail.gmail.com>	 <47E54579.6060202@smash-net.org>	 <1206208709.30987.9.camel@NOTE_GENTOO64.PHHEIMNETZ> <49bf44f10803221109p4593731w1ed0830194141a16@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <49bf44f10803221109p4593731w1ed0830194141a16@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 93b7fe80-196b-4d12-8ee5-8dceb87de79f
X-Archives-Hash: 4bf0adb979ccb7b8ad6b5100d815933d

Grant schrieb:
>>  > > I had become an AMD guy, but I think I'm hearing that Intel is beating
>>  > > AMD in performance tests.  Plus my AMD64 X2 desktop should be much
>>  > > faster than my Intel laptop but is actually slower.  What do you guys
>>  > > think?
>>  > >
>>  > > - Grant
>>  > >
>>  > Well the experience of a desktop or an application depends on more than
>>  > just the processor. Nearly every part of a computer does its part. And
>>  > then you have the software, what software you use, how it is build, what
>>  > reqirements this software has on other software and hardware and so on.
>>  > Does it uses the FPU or is it heavy on the ALU. How much IO is used and
>>  > how much can the system provide.
>>  > But if you believe the average hardwaremagazine, intel is a step ahead
>>  > right now.
>>  >
>>  > Norman
>>
>>  When Intel finally implements HyperTransport (I think it's planned for
>>  the next generation), AMD will loose their last bastion performance
>>  wise ... what a pity.
>>     
>
> It is a pity.  When did AMD's overall advantage disappear?
>
> - Grant
>   
With the arrival of the Core CPU's.
-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list