From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JaaJ1-0004FS-Or for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:36:27 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E6A9DE06D7; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:36:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmailhost04.isp.att.net (fmailhost04.isp.att.net [204.127.217.104]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFA1DE06D7 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:36:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [216.78.71.58] (host-216-78-71-58.jan.bellsouth.net[216.78.71.58]) by isp.att.net (frfwmhc04) with ESMTP id <20080315173623H0400a9isbe>; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:36:24 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [216.78.71.58] Message-ID: <47DC0915.1060003@bellsouth.net> Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 12:36:21 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080209 SeaMonkey/1.1.8 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Randomly dumb questions References: <3D69B4A7-2EFE-4DD3-B2E0-43A02D42EA05@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> <200803151604.28756.shrdlu@unlimitedmail.org> <200803151650.51347.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> <200803151812.48732.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> In-Reply-To: <200803151812.48732.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 568cee62-8492-4ac7-a78e-ea15bd9cfeb2 X-Archives-Hash: 6e013e24c638a416f65137f2121f1792 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > On Samstag, 15. M=E4rz 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote: > =20 >> OK, lets go back to step 1, and try to think it through this time. >> >> - a user sends a mail from account X to list Y >> - same user is also subscribed to list Y from account X >> - if list Y sends a copy of the mail to the user at account X, then th= e >> user has a duplicate because by definition *he already has the >> original* >> - it is completely reasonable to give the list admin the option to >> enable or disable this behaviour >> =20 > > > but you are wrong. > > You get your email back from the list. > > GMAIL just does not show it. > =20 That is the way I understand it too. It's not the list mail server that=20 stops it, it's the mail server on the users end. I'll have a copy of=20 this email in my sent folder but I'll also get a copy back in my inbox=20 folder in a little bit too. I also sort mine by threads so it is neat=20 or the threading will be . . . confusing. I have enough confusion=20 already.=20 Dale :-) :-) --=20 gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list