From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JHPWA-0006YY-7F for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 20:14:46 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 00FD1E045F; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 20:14:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.152]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF3E1E045F for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 20:14:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e21so2085946fga.14 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:14:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mbAqIIqU1BVadZIBr4M7edJjTtzNS0ktWOhacn5cGco=; b=G0bRRq+wzW7VqOdDJaRDsEBSgBxYcRr0uPTaZZwle6rLIzjx+QJuWNW62whikzQl92pq9Z2X+lLDJhfZ94/RBZHxhnR1NSERc5bQPoa7RQpZph0ApM96u2HMabtX/s7qInHXClY7/mNDcOTHxnscr7px3H+g5gRNbjsn4vflzm0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=BGlMLNNWTMOuQO4Pgo4BYAiuOURXqAX8vOmDR16MHpeBa6gCG4ekKaaLeuehmg8GKuLfjV5Ahk2Qem37u+JxPQ9AT1g8Z1OPXd21rf9o8B7nggUUYBp6nRgrALiDcDWsuQHNVFvDZu2RckVW83I87i7QhLvYqgmepfaJRK6SQ/U= Received: by 10.86.82.16 with SMTP id f16mr8064836fgb.60.1201032854122; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:14:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?10.0.0.6? ( [85.127.91.89]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l12sm10399849fgb.8.2008.01.22.12.14.12 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:14:12 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <47964E8F.4010905@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:14:07 +0100 From: Thomas Pani User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071229) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 4.0.0 References: <200801221053.33355.uwix@iway.na> <808657.19362.qm@web60025.mail.yahoo.com> <428c4cda0801221154v71aaaae0yef6df89245651a0a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <428c4cda0801221154v71aaaae0yef6df89245651a0a@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: b49f6240-648f-4043-a8f1-77fc66a7ab2f X-Archives-Hash: de3b9b11a0a0339e2fa00dfa018aca59 Mantas Povilaitis wrote: > AFAIK 4.0.0 will not be unmasked. Only 4.0.1 (or 4.1?). yep. from gentoo-dev: Wulf C. Krueger wrote: > Carsten Lohrke wrote: >> The code base has too many issues and is incomplete compared to >> KDE 3.5, so it's not ready to push it to the regular ~arch user, yet. > > I didn't mean hard-masked. I've reconsidered, though, and seeing the new > timeline upstream published for the 4.0.1, I agree. We'll see about > 4.0.1's quality... > > Thus, KDE 4.0.0 is going to go in hard-masked. -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list