From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JFFXb-0005fy-CV for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:11:19 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5AE22E026B; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:10:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www01.badapple.net (www01.badapple.net [64.79.219.163]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC177E00DF for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:10:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.72.230.240] (nat-dip11.fw.corp.yahoo.com [209.131.62.120]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ramin@badapple.net) by www01.badapple.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53B4126F4002 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:10:38 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <478E72CD.8070607@badapple.net> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:10:37 -0800 From: kashani User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Routing problem ? References: <51e438da0801101736j4e0f1f01lccf0d27817909942@mail.gmail.com> <51e438da0801130312q6a358be9lb9532db63234cf71@mail.gmail.com> <20080113140652.1c81cde9.hilse@web.de> <200801161222.32688.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200801161222.32688.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: a5fda2f9-61cf-49df-a5b7-59832f61e4ee X-Archives-Hash: d23999e8edf3011dd969552857f8c182 Mick wrote: > I agree that this is not related to the ISP. What you probably need to do is > set up RIP2 in your router 1, to be able to recognize other subdomains > (192.168.2.XXX). Then it'll process packets coming from that subdomain. The > router manual ought to help you out on setting this up. Sure let's make something simple really complicated. And sucky. Is there some sort of dynamic routing happening on this network? Different possible paths to get to machines? Links we might want to balance traffic over? Other routers sending route updates? If not, then why would we want the added complexity of a routing protocol? There are all of two routes on this network and they never change. Static routing is the right choice and functionally no different than if the route had been inserted via a routing protocol. No routing protocol will make router1 NAT addresses it doesn't want to. Adding that subnet to the NAT list will, but that is outside the routing table or it would have already worked. kashani -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list