public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dale <dalek1967@bellsouth.net>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user]  Re: Daniel Robbins' come back ?
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 02:10:00 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <478B18D8.1070907@bellsouth.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <30000.194.237.142.6.1200297071.squirrel@www.nyblom.org>

Naga wrote:
>> reader@newsguy.com wrote:
>> Case in point, portage I have read has a lot of hacks that are hurting
>>     
> development.  In the end it works pretty well but it makes it really
> hard to add more "features" without messing up something else.  So,
> someone needs to make a decision on what needs to happen with that. Some
> say rewrite portage, some say switch to C** and some say switch to
> Plaudus (sp?).  This just seems to be one thing I have read about.
>
> I'm sure Portage (the program) has allot of hacks in it but I'm also sure
> that had those who advocate its shortcomings been concerned about
> backwards compability with older stable versions they would have been more
> humble in there criticism.
>   

Yep, you are likely dead on there.  Thing is, now, someone needs to
decide what to do next.  I wouldn't mind a change that means you can not
go backwards.  I have said M$ needs to cut that cord myself.  It may
hurt at first but in the long run it will pay off.

>   
>> Like you, I wish I could do more.  I would be willing to learn to code
>>     
> if I felt it was worthwhile.  I am disabled so I have plenty of time to
> learn and contribute but after my past experiences on -dev, I won't be
> repeating that for a VERY long time and only after some things change.
> The devs complain about not having enough help but when someone wants to
> learn and help some they sort of shoot themselves in the foot.
>
> The best way to help out is to try and join a team/herd. They are much
> friendlier then the -dev list and in much need of help. The easiest way I
> think is to join an arch team as an arch tester.
>
>
>
>   

That may be true but the past few times on -dev left a bad taste.  If I
start learning to code and stuff I would want to move up.  Right now,
I'm not even remotely interested in that.  I'll just stay right here
where I am.  Of course, if I get the same here, I'd go away from here too. 

Dale

:-)  :-)  :-) 
-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



  reply	other threads:[~2008-01-14  8:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 87+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-12  9:11 [gentoo-user] Daniel Robbins' come back ? alain.didierjean
2008-01-12 10:31 ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-12 12:08   ` Jil Larner
2008-01-12 12:55     ` Mick
2008-01-12 13:34       ` Dale
2008-01-12 17:07         ` Richard Marzan
2008-01-12 17:22           ` Renat Golubchyk
2008-01-12 17:49             ` Hal Martin
2008-01-12 18:13             ` Richard Marzan
2008-01-12 21:17               ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2008-01-13 14:07                 ` Eddie Mihalow Jr
2008-01-13 14:23                   ` Naga Toro
2008-01-13 14:33                     ` Eddie Mihalow Jr
2008-01-13 15:06                       ` Naga Toro
2008-01-13 16:31                         ` Eddie Mihalow Jr
2008-01-13 17:37                           ` Naga Toro
2008-01-14  5:42                             ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-14 11:43                               ` Galevsky
2008-01-14 11:19                             ` Eddie Mihalow Jr
2008-01-13 16:45                       ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2008-01-13 22:39                         ` Dale
2008-01-14  6:54                           ` [gentoo-user] " reader
2008-01-14  7:28                             ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-14  7:41                             ` Dale
2008-01-14  7:51                               ` Naga
2008-01-14  8:10                                 ` Dale [this message]
2008-01-14 16:18                               ` James
2008-01-14 11:16                         ` [gentoo-user] " Eddie Mihalow Jr
2008-01-19 15:37                         ` [gentoo-user] Quo vadis Gentoo [WAS: Daniel Robbins' come back ?] Enrico Weigelt
2008-01-19 19:55                           ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2008-01-16  4:58                     ` [gentoo-user] Re: Daniel Robbins' come back ? »Q«
2008-01-13 14:48                 ` Michael Schmarck
2008-01-12 20:03           ` Michael Schmarck
2008-01-12 21:16           ` [gentoo-user] " Hemmann, Volker Armin
2008-01-13  9:10           ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-12 17:11         ` Δημήτριος Ροπόκης
2008-01-19 12:45         ` Enrico Weigelt
2008-01-20  0:40           ` [gentoo-user] " reader
2008-01-23 17:35             ` Enrico Weigelt
2008-01-23 18:48               ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2008-01-12 22:06       ` James
2008-01-13  0:03         ` Dale
2008-01-13  4:08           ` James
2008-01-13  7:56             ` Mark Kirkwood
2008-01-13  9:31               ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-14  2:52                 ` Iain Buchanan
2008-01-13  9:58               ` Uwe Thiem
2008-01-13  9:29         ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-12 19:19   ` [gentoo-user] " fire-eyes
2008-01-13  9:37     ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-13 10:05       ` Alan E. Davis
2008-01-14  8:47         ` [gentoo-user] " Thufir
2008-01-13 10:06       ` [gentoo-user] " Uwe Thiem
2008-01-13 10:18         ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-13  1:12   ` [gentoo-user] " James
2008-01-13 10:41     ` Mick
2008-01-13 14:51       ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-14  1:19         ` James
2008-01-14  5:35           ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-14  6:04             ` Iain Buchanan
2008-01-14 12:31               ` Mick
2008-01-14 10:26     ` Thufir
2008-01-14 16:51       ` James
2008-01-14 18:11         ` Etaoin Shrdlu
2008-01-14 18:30           ` Jil Larner
2008-01-14 19:47             ` James
2008-01-14 20:40               ` reader
2008-01-14 21:13                 ` Jil Larner
2008-01-14 21:03               ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-15  5:22                 ` reader
2008-01-15  5:42                   ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-15  7:26                     ` Iain Buchanan
2008-01-15  7:57                     ` Mick
2008-01-14 21:51               ` Jil Larner
2008-01-15  0:31               ` Iain Buchanan
2008-01-14 19:15           ` James
2008-01-14 20:43             ` [gentoo-user] Re: License issues [was:Daniel Robbins' come back ?] Etaoin Shrdlu
2008-01-14 21:33               ` James
2008-01-14 22:16                 ` Etaoin Shrdlu
2008-01-15 11:39                 ` Michael Schmarck
2008-01-14 21:16             ` [gentoo-user] Re: Daniel Robbins' come back ? Alan McKinnon
2008-01-15  1:36               ` James
2008-01-15 11:34                 ` Michael Schmarck
2008-01-15 11:31             ` Michael Schmarck
2008-01-17  6:37         ` Thufir
2008-01-19 14:55     ` [gentoo-user] Quo vadis Gentoo [WAS: Daniel Robbins' come back ?] Enrico Weigelt
2008-01-14 10:30 ` [gentoo-user] Re: Daniel Robbins' come back ? Thufir

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=478B18D8.1070907@bellsouth.net \
    --to=dalek1967@bellsouth.net \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox