From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 303B01396D0 for ; Sat, 16 Sep 2017 14:19:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CD6C61FC0A3; Sat, 16 Sep 2017 14:19:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost01d.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost01d.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.1.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 732EA1FC005 for ; Sat, 16 Sep 2017 14:19:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.69.80.10] (helo=peak.localnet) by smarthost01d.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1dtDwE-0002Qz-O3 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 16 Sep 2017 14:19:18 +0000 From: Peter Humphrey To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Choice of KVM? Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2017 15:19:18 +0100 Message-ID: <47052055.5YIo8tqYQF@peak> In-Reply-To: <2617748.G2Bb0v0RSI@peak> References: <2617748.G2Bb0v0RSI@peak> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Originating-smarthost01d-IP: [82.69.80.10] Feedback-ID: 82.69.80.10 X-Archives-Salt: 848f9369-1029-471f-941e-db7e3355f2a7 X-Archives-Hash: cb5e5b6797f1aee04ea56b23a0a55239 On Saturday, 16 September 2017 15:00:16 BST Peter Humphrey wrote: > Hello list, > > I didn't know where else to ask this, or I'd have spared you the > annoyance. Apologies if needed. > > I need to replace a 4-port KVM switch by StarTech, which has failed twice > - that is, the original failed and its replacement has as well. > > Two makes present themselves: Aten and Belkin. Does anyone have an opinion > on which is better? They seem to have similar abililties and /modi > operandi/. > > Many thanks. As always, as soon as I'd sent that I found an answer: someone who'd replaced "flaky" Belkin with Aten. Sorry for the noise. -- Regards, Peter.