From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MitxL-00023d-RC for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:49:16 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DEC35E07D3; Wed, 2 Sep 2009 22:57:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f227.google.com (mail-bw0-f227.google.com [209.85.218.227]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93C0CE07D3 for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2009 22:57:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz27 with SMTP id 27so1244856bwz.34 for ; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 15:57:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=AqR1ijNxkfEe/k2Iow6/zHiZmyhL8o1n3lCBdHvvlUw=; b=I6/eKeyiDI2Mc+kXtxNz2x6xyQ4/bwFoLVveOohkiofX/25FhuJTerekUMuIKIfl9a fJH13QPA3SapUVCXMlcK+gB2c2muM2IqE9+n2mcqozba3Fi78MVyKt7HrusVAo1z+hjw SEGfZFT/dIgJtAtItvoaEdimKfIm5fcwRx1Mg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=svvcDkKO5f4j9RsPHWnaPhEhhSmRT+HKBeULqYJIoevpaSlroJWT6lRI7PMtRSREPR 05/60KnLJ8OMX3UywcAz93l1ZDb60N+s/jEIJiYZZJvRhx3peQW3XNbPXqdEBLb0voO0 GK5MfJuU/UCzzxvTcLOvE8gxMWa79JWtPsOVw= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.50.25 with SMTP id c25mr3790016muk.10.1251932273747; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 15:57:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A9EEE44.6030008@badapple.net> References: <46d08bd30909021440p56976b33q8f183755bd39a241@mail.gmail.com> <4A9EEE44.6030008@badapple.net> Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 18:57:53 -0400 Message-ID: <46d08bd30909021557s9596893x4decdb8bcb86fe47@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo, MySQL, UltraMonkey Clusters From: Nick Khamis To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e65c8e1c75a7630472a032c0 X-Archives-Salt: e86d55c5-4af6-4ded-8b7f-28ab707346cf X-Archives-Hash: 2f3f2c40fc00a6d352b0e4086096a4a6 --0016e65c8e1c75a7630472a032c0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 The database cluster will be the backend to our own Customer Relation Management System that needs to be scaled to size and performance. In terms of what is and not is avail in the portage tree can we not just build 5.1 from binary source "how hard is this" lb_curses etc.... The problem with MThe database cluster will be the backend to our own Customer Relation = Management System that=A0needs to be=A0scaled to size and performance. In t= erms=A0of what is and not is=A0avail in the portage tree can we not just bu= ild 5.1 from binary source "how hard is this" lb_curses etc.... T= he problem with=A0M<ySQL 5=A0was=A0it had terrible seek time for inner a= nd left joins, that is why I see ourselves going right to 5.1.=A0
=A0
Regards,
Ninus
--0016e65c8e1c75a7630472a032c0--