From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-69955-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
	id 1IaK5R-0007ut-BV
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 23:45:05 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with SMTP id l8PNYVZH022942;
	Tue, 25 Sep 2007 23:34:32 GMT
Received: from www01.badapple.net (www01.badapple.net [64.79.219.163])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l8PNTd6K017306
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 23:29:39 GMT
Received: from [10.72.229.31] (nat-dip11.fw.corp.yahoo.com [209.131.62.120])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: ramin@badapple.net)
	by www01.badapple.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EE1D1500F2
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:29:38 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <46F999E2.7090901@badapple.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:29:38 -0700
From: kashani <kashani-list@badapple.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:  gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Opinions on Host's Decision Please
References: <49bf44f10709211437l67dfa91av64dc4df6b25fa385@mail.gmail.com>	 <49389B7F-3A67-4EEB-B48A-34D85F7DFC44@screamingdolphin.net>	 <49bf44f10709241911u104d53e6n929b966c23d19ebf@mail.gmail.com>	 <200709251854.32931.michaelkintzios@gmail.com>	 <49bf44f10709251154t3109fc39k944d89b93d12be48@mail.gmail.com>	 <20070925160748.79b4b381@pascal.spore.ath.cx> <49bf44f10709251600r36752de4sede90a5ca56ae11e@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <49bf44f10709251600r36752de4sede90a5ca56ae11e@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: f3f70fec-5cdf-4a95-b258-4f3f135182ce
X-Archives-Hash: f9f08821f72b42bde957440bab175851

Grant wrote:
> That sounds awesome from a DIY perspective, but this server provides
> 100% of my income and I feel like it should be hosted.  Maybe I'm
> wrong.  Does anyone else house a money-critical server in their home?
> 

Hours Comcast was down last year: 140 (random outages)
Hours my VPS was down last year: .5 (planned hardware upgrade)

Available peak bandwidth outbound on Cable: 768 kb/s
Available peak bandwidth outbound on VPS: > 100 Mb/s

Cable statis IP on black lists: yes
VPS Statis IP's on black lists: no

Total outbound traffic possible on 768 kb/s cable in a month: 250 GB
Total outbound traffic with my VPS plan: 2TB

If you're hosting your own blog or other nonsense do it at home. If
you're making money off your site or have reasons for it not to be down,
don't host it at home.

kashani

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list