[gentoo-user] emerge masked pidgin with flagedit

[gentoo-user] emerge masked pidgin with flagedit

[Thufir]

Here's where I'm at:

localhost ~ #
localhost ~ #
localhost ~ # cat /etc/make.conf
####################################################
## ATTENTION: THIS IS THE MAKE.CONF ON THE LIVECD ##
## PLEASE EDIT /mnt/gentoo/etc/make.conf INSTEAD  ##
####################################################
# These settings were set by the catalyst build script that automatically
# built this stage.
# Please consult /etc/make.conf.example for a more detailed example.
#CFLAGS="-O2 -march=i686 -pipe"
CFLAGS="-march=i686 -O2 -pipe"
CXXFLAGS="${CFLAGS}"
# This should not be changed unless you know exactly what you are doing.  You
# should probably be using a different stage, instead.
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=""
MAKEOPTS=""
CONFIG_PROTECT="-*"
USE="7zip msn"
FEATURES=""
localhost ~ #
localhost ~ # ll /etc/portage/package.keywords
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jul 26 22:10 /etc/portage/package.keywords
localhost ~ #
localhost ~ # cat /etc/portage/package.keywords
localhost ~ #
localhost ~ # emerge pidgin
Calculating dependencies |
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "pidgin" have been masked.
!!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request:
- net-im/pidgin-2.0.2 (masked by: ~x86 keyword)
- net-im/pidgin-2.0.0 (masked by: ~x86 keyword)
- net-im/pidgin-2.0.1 (masked by: ~x86 keyword)

For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or
refer to the Gentoo Handbook.

localhost ~ #
localhost ~ # flagedit net-im/pidgin-2.0.2 -- +~x86
localhost ~ #
localhost ~ # flagedit
7zip msn
localhost ~ #
localhost ~ # emerge pidgin
--- Invalid atom in /etc/portage/package.keywords: net-im/pidgin-2.0.2
Calculating dependencies |
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "pidgin" have been masked.
!!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request:
- net-im/pidgin-2.0.2 (masked by: ~x86 keyword)
- net-im/pidgin-2.0.0 (masked by: ~x86 keyword)
- net-im/pidgin-2.0.1 (masked by: ~x86 keyword)

For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or
refer to the Gentoo Handbook.

localhost ~ #
localhost ~ # cat /etc/portage/package.keywords
net-im/pidgin-2.0.2 ~x86
localhost ~ #
localhost ~ # date
Thu Jul 26 22:13:02 PDT 2007
localhost ~ #
localhost ~ #

Now, I'm following:

" flagedit

   1. Install: emerge flagedit
   2. Usage: flagedit <atom> -- +<keyword>, for example flagedit
dev-util/libconf -- +~x86 "
<http://gentoo-wiki.com/Masked#flagedit>


As far as I can tell, I'm following the wiki directions (?).



thanks,

Thufir
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge masked pidgin with flagedit

[maximuswork]

Thufir пишет:
> Here's where I'm at:
>
> localhost ~ #
> localhost ~ #
> localhost ~ # cat /etc/make.conf
> ####################################################
> ## ATTENTION: THIS IS THE MAKE.CONF ON THE LIVECD ##
> ## PLEASE EDIT /mnt/gentoo/etc/make.conf INSTEAD  ##
> ####################################################
> # These settings were set by the catalyst build script that automatically
> # built this stage.
> # Please consult /etc/make.conf.example for a more detailed example.
> #CFLAGS="-O2 -march=i686 -pipe"
> CFLAGS="-march=i686 -O2 -pipe"
> CXXFLAGS="${CFLAGS}"
> # This should not be changed unless you know exactly what you are doing.  You
> # should probably be using a different stage, instead.
> CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=""
> MAKEOPTS=""
> CONFIG_PROTECT="-*"
> USE="7zip msn"
> FEATURES=""
> localhost ~ #
> localhost ~ # ll /etc/portage/package.keywords
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jul 26 22:10 /etc/portage/package.keywords
> localhost ~ #
> localhost ~ # cat /etc/portage/package.keywords
> localhost ~ #
> localhost ~ # emerge pidgin
> Calculating dependencies |
> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "pidgin" have been masked.
> !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request:
> - net-im/pidgin-2.0.2 (masked by: ~x86 keyword)
> - net-im/pidgin-2.0.0 (masked by: ~x86 keyword)
> - net-im/pidgin-2.0.1 (masked by: ~x86 keyword)
>
> For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or
> refer to the Gentoo Handbook.
>
> localhost ~ #
> localhost ~ # flagedit net-im/pidgin-2.0.2 -- +~x86
> localhost ~ #
> localhost ~ # flagedit
> 7zip msn
> localhost ~ #
> localhost ~ # emerge pidgin
> --- Invalid atom in /etc/portage/package.keywords: net-im/pidgin-2.0.2
> Calculating dependencies |
> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "pidgin" have been masked.
> !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request:
> - net-im/pidgin-2.0.2 (masked by: ~x86 keyword)
> - net-im/pidgin-2.0.0 (masked by: ~x86 keyword)
> - net-im/pidgin-2.0.1 (masked by: ~x86 keyword)
>
> For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or
> refer to the Gentoo Handbook.
>
> localhost ~ #
> localhost ~ # cat /etc/portage/package.keywords
> net-im/pidgin-2.0.2 ~x86
> localhost ~ #
> localhost ~ # date
> Thu Jul 26 22:13:02 PDT 2007
> localhost ~ #
> localhost ~ #
>
> Now, I'm following:
>
> " flagedit
>
>    1. Install: emerge flagedit
>    2. Usage: flagedit <atom> -- +<keyword>, for example flagedit
> dev-util/libconf -- +~x86 "
> <http://gentoo-wiki.com/Masked#flagedit>
>
>
> As far as I can tell, I'm following the wiki directions (?).
>
>
>
> thanks,
>
> Thufir
>   
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86"  emerge pidgin

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge masked pidgin with flagedit

[Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1270 bytes --]

On Friday 27 July 2007, maximuswork <maximuswork@yandex.ru> wrote 
about 'Re: [gentoo-user] emerge masked pidgin with flagedit':
> Thufir пишет:
> > --- Invalid atom in /etc/portage/package.keywords: net-im/pidgin-2.0.2

Aha!  See there's a problem with your /etc/portage/package.keywords.

> > localhost ~ # cat /etc/portage/package.keywords
> > net-im/pidgin-2.0.2 ~x86

Oh, that first part is an invalid atom.  The proper systax for atoms is in 
the ebuild manpage, IIRC.  In any case, your problem is that you've 
specified a version, without a comparator.

You probably want '~net-im/pidgin-2.0.2' instead of 
just 'net-im/pidgin-2.0.2'.  The tilde indicates that version, or any 
ebuild revisions (e.g. -r1) or the same version.  You could use '=' 
instead of tilde, if you really don't want any other ebuild revisions.

> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86"  emerge pidgin

Um, no.  Not unless the OP wants ~x86 dependencies to be brought in, and 
all that downgraded to x86 when they do their next emerge world.

-- 
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.                     ,= ,-_-. =. 
bss03@volumehost.net                      ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy           `-'(. .)`-' 
http://iguanasuicide.org/                      \_/     

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge masked pidgin with flagedit

[Dale]

maximuswork wrote:
> Thufir пишет:
>> Here's where I'm at:
>>
>> localhost ~ #
>> localhost ~ #
>> localhost ~ # cat /etc/make.conf
>> ####################################################
>> ## ATTENTION: THIS IS THE MAKE.CONF ON THE LIVECD ##
>> ## PLEASE EDIT /mnt/gentoo/etc/make.conf INSTEAD  ##
>> ####################################################
>> # These settings were set by the catalyst build script that
>> automatically
>> # built this stage.
>> # Please consult /etc/make.conf.example for a more detailed example.
>> << SNIP >>
>>
>>
>> As far as I can tell, I'm following the wiki directions (?).
>>
>>
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> Thufir
>>   
> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86"  emerge pidgin
>

Is it me or is all this being done to the CD environment instead of in a
chroot environment?  Note the obviousDale

:-)  :-)
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge masked pidgin with flagedit

[Thufir]

On 7/26/07, Dale <dalek1967@bellsouth.net> wrote:

[...]
> >> ####################################################
> >> ## ATTENTION: THIS IS THE MAKE.CONF ON THE LIVECD ##
> >> ## PLEASE EDIT /mnt/gentoo/etc/make.conf INSTEAD  ##
> >> ####################################################
[...]
> Is it me or is all this being done to the CD environment instead of in a
> chroot environment?  Note the obviousDale
[...]

That's a holdover from the networkless install via the live cd :)

It's on a hard drive.


-Thufir
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge masked pidgin with flagedit

[Dale]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 703 bytes --]

Thufir wrote:
> On 7/26/07, Dale <dalek1967@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> [...]
>   
>>>> ####################################################
>>>> ## ATTENTION: THIS IS THE MAKE.CONF ON THE LIVECD ##
>>>> ## PLEASE EDIT /mnt/gentoo/etc/make.conf INSTEAD  ##
>>>> ####################################################
>>>>         
> [...]
>   
>> Is it me or is all this being done to the CD environment instead of in a
>> chroot environment?  Note the obviousDale
>>     
> [...]
>
> That's a holdover from the networkless install via the live cd :)
>
> It's on a hard drive.
>
>
> -Thufir
>   

OK.  Sounds good.  I was just thinking about what a mess it would be
when you rebooted.  o_O

Dale

:-)  :-) 

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1440 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge masked pidgin with flagedit

[Thufir]

On 7/27/07, Dale <dalek1967@bellsouth.net> wrote:
[...]
> That's a holdover from the networkless install via the live cd :)
>
> It's on a hard drive.
>
>
> -Thufir
>
>
>  OK.  Sounds good.  I was just thinking about what a mess it would be when
> you rebooted.  o_O
>
>  Dale
>
>  :-)  :-)

ROFLMAO !


-Thufir
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge masked pidgin with flagedit

[Luis Ortiz]

Thufir wrote:
-- SNIP --
> localhost ~ #
> localhost ~ # flagedit net-im/pidgin-2.0.2 -- +~x86
> localhost ~ #
-- SNIP --

Remove the one you just added by doing:
localhost ~ # flagedit net-im/pidgin-2.0.2 -- %~x86


The command that you should've run was:

localhost ~ # flagedit =net-im/pidgin-2.0.2 -- +~x86

or

localhost ~ # flagedit net-im/pidgin -- +~x86


Note the '=' when you specify an exact or part of a version number.
  eg. =net-im/pidgin-2*
      =net-im/pidgin-2.0.2


I hope this helps.
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge masked pidgin with flagedit

[Thufir]

On 7/26/07, Luis Ortiz <wichos@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thufir wrote:
> -- SNIP --
> > localhost ~ #
> > localhost ~ # flagedit net-im/pidgin-2.0.2 -- +~x86
[...]
> The command that you should've run was:
>
> localhost ~ # flagedit =net-im/pidgin-2.0.2 -- +~x86

That the wiki doesn't mention to include the equals sign is frustrating.

> or
>
> localhost ~ # flagedit net-im/pidgin -- +~x86
[...]

Didn't I do that?  For some things, the equals sign doesn't seem to be
required when using flagedit, for others it seems to be.

Anyhow, got it working :)


thanks,

Thufir
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge masked pidgin with flagedit

[Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 752 bytes --]

On Friday 27 July 2007, Thufir <hawat.thufir@gmail.com> wrote about 'Re: 
[gentoo-user] emerge masked pidgin with flagedit':
> Didn't I do that?  For some things, the equals sign doesn't seem to be
> required when using flagedit, for others it seems to be.

Yes, because it is expecting an ebuild atom. Do
man 5 ebuild
and read the section on 'DEPEND Atoms', they have a simple but precise 
syntax.

BTW, if the wiki is broken, just fix it.  I'm not sure it's an official 
source of documentation anyway.

-- 
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.                     ,= ,-_-. =. 
bss03@volumehost.net                      ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy           `-'(. .)`-' 
http://iguanasuicide.org/                      \_/     

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge masked pidgin with flagedit

[Bo Ørsted Andresen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 697 bytes --]

On Saturday 28 July 2007 05:13:58 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> > Didn't I do that?  For some things, the equals sign doesn't seem to be
> > required when using flagedit, for others it seems to be.

Yeah, flagedit isn't particularly well documented. `flagedit --help` is the 
only documentation it has and clearly it's far from complete. I'm sure the 
author would be delighted to take a patch to fix or improve that (preferably 
by introducing a man page).. ;)

> BTW, if the wiki is broken, just fix it.  I'm not sure it's an official
> source of documentation anyway.

It most certainly isn't and anyone ever using it do well to take a critical 
view of it.

-- 
Bo Andresen

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]