From: Billy Wayne McCann <thebillywayne@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] Using oldconfig and kernel revisions ( was : Cannot boot 2.6.21-gentoo-r4)
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:11:03 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <469D2257.8020908@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <469D1788.3030603@gmail.com>
Right after I sent my previous mail, it hit me that maybe a better topic
than just "OT" would be better.
Billy Wayne McCann wrote:
> Albert Hopkins wrote:
>> On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 15:19 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 17 July 2007, Mick wrote:
>>>> On Tuesday 17 July 2007 13:20, Billy McCann wrote:
>>>>> Hi Mick. From what I understand, using oldconfig for major
>>>>> version changes (.20 -> .21) is a bad idea. Here's what I did. It
>>>>> may be slow and stupid but it worked like a charm.
>>>> Sure, but I have been using oldconfig for previous major changes and
>>>> never had a problem like this before.
>>> Now you know why the kernel devs keep telling you not to do it, heh :-)
>>>
>> I don't know which kernel dev keeps saying that, but I'd recommend
>> he/she specify what is meant by "major version" since, historically:
>>
>> 2.6.22
>> ^ ^ ^
>> | | +--- Revision
>> | +----- Minor version
>> +------- Major version
>>
>> And therefore .20 -> .21 would not be considered a "major" version
>> change by most accounts.
>>
>> --
>> Albert W. Hopkins
>
> Thanks for correcting my nomenclature, Albert. I too was wanting to use
> oldconfig for upgrading my kernel from .20 to .21, but decided not to
> after reading the recommendation of the Gentoo Kernel Upgrade Guide, the
> relevant portion of which I have pasted below. Perhaps this applied only
> to the specific example used.
>
> My purpose for pasting this into this discussion is three-fold: to show
> why I said what I did, to hopefully dispel the notion that I merely made
> this all up, and to discuss the relevance of the pasted text itself.
>
> I apologize for being off-topic and hope that Mick finds himself a
> working kernel config soon. :)
>
>
> Billy Wayne
>
> =====================
>
> (Note the the second and third sentences of the second paragraph.)
>
> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/kernel-upgrade.xml
>
> 10. Advanced: Using your old kernel .config to configure a new one
>
> It is sometimes possible to save time by re-using the configuration file
> from your old kernel when configuring the new one. Note that this is
> generally unsafe -- too many changes between every kernel release for
> this to be a reliable upgrade path.
>
> The only situation where this is appropriate is when upgrading from one
> Gentoo kernel revision to another. For example, the changes made between
> gentoo-sources-2.6.9-r1 and gentoo-sources-2.6.9-r2 will be very small,
> so it is usually OK to use the following method. However, it is not
> appropriate to use it in the example used throughout this document:
> upgrading from 2.6.8 to 2.6.9. Too many changes between the official
> releases, and the method described below does not display enough context
> to the user, often resulting in the user running into problems because
> they disabled options that they really didn't want to.
>
>
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-17 20:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-17 11:40 [gentoo-user] Cannot boot 2.6.21-gentoo-r4 Mick
2007-07-17 12:20 ` Billy McCann
2007-07-17 12:45 ` Mick
2007-07-17 13:19 ` Alan McKinnon
2007-07-17 14:02 ` Albert Hopkins
2007-07-17 15:35 ` Dale
2007-07-17 19:24 ` [gentoo-user] OT ( was : Cannot boot 2.6.21-gentoo-r4) Billy Wayne McCann
2007-07-17 20:11 ` Billy Wayne McCann [this message]
2007-07-17 21:19 ` [gentoo-user] Using oldconfig and kernel revisions " Stroller
2007-07-18 4:59 ` [gentoo-user] OT " Albert Hopkins
2007-07-19 20:33 ` Billy McCann
2007-07-20 6:49 ` Luigi Pinna
2007-07-20 9:02 ` Ian Hastie
2007-07-20 12:42 ` Albert Hopkins
2007-07-17 13:22 ` Re[2]: [gentoo-user] Cannot boot 2.6.21-gentoo-r4 Sergey A. Kobzar
2007-07-17 13:30 ` Neil Bothwick
2007-07-17 14:00 ` Mick
2007-07-17 14:46 ` Neil Bothwick
2007-07-17 15:18 ` Mick
2007-07-17 21:02 ` Peter Alfredsen
2007-07-17 22:20 ` Mick
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=469D2257.8020908@gmail.com \
--to=thebillywayne@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox