From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1IAVwN-0006fv-Ph for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 19:09:04 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6GJ7EMK020362; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 19:07:14 GMT Received: from imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net (imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.71]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6GJ0u8G010730 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 19:00:56 GMT Received: from ibm66aec.bellsouth.net ([216.79.243.199]) by imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20070716190055.ODLD355.imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm66aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 15:00:55 -0400 Received: from [216.79.243.199] by ibm66aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20070716190049.YDEI15943.ibm66aec.bellsouth.net@[216.79.243.199]> for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 15:00:49 -0400 Message-ID: <469BC059.4030300@bellsouth.net> Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 14:00:41 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.4) Gecko/20070602 SeaMonkey/1.1.2 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Seamonkey and saving images taking so long References: <4683D4A8.6070707@bellsouth.net> <469AE603.2060501@gmail.com> <469AFA0A.20900@bellsouth.net> <200707161826.52311.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200707161826.52311.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030904090700090902030004" X-Archives-Salt: c1e6c805-eb29-4e09-a6cb-46d2642643f9 X-Archives-Hash: 05a330670f0d05ce5b854869bae453ef This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030904090700090902030004 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mick wrote: > On Monday 16 July 2007 05:54, Dale wrote: > > >> I think it is a bug myself. It seems to me that there should be a limit >> of some kind on this file. Maybe a time limit, size limit or >> something. Me, I just hate filing bug reports. I have filed a few but >> only after some serious guru >> said I should. I did go search to see if one had been filed but I >> didn't see one filed. >> > > [snip...] > >> Any thoughts from a serious guru about whether I should file this as a >> bug with Seamonkey or not? >> > > I am not a guru and some would argue I am not serious either, but is there > somewhere in the Mozilla settings how much cache and space for > entries/history it is allowed to use? I am thinking of Opera here which > offers you such fine tuning options. > Well, I do have cache set to 500Mbs but I did that so that it could cache images and such on web pages. I frequent some sites that have a lot of images and since I am on dial-up, very slow dial-up, I like it to store them locally as much as possible. Over clockers forums is one such site that takes forever to load when I have recently cleared the cache. I think what is needed here is a limit to the downloads.rdf file's size or something to that effect. I can say this, I love that it is now faster. I just wonder how many other people are having this issue and have no clue what is wrong. Dale :-) :-) --------------030904090700090902030004 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mick wrote: 
On Monday 16 July 2007 05:54, Dale wrote:

  
I think it is a bug myself.  It seems to me that there should be a limit
of some kind on this file.  Maybe a time limit, size limit or
something.  Me, I just hate filing bug reports.  I have filed a few but
only after some serious guru
said I should.  I did go search to see if one had been filed but I
didn't see one filed.
    

[snip...]
  
Any thoughts from a serious guru about whether I should file this as a
bug with Seamonkey or not?
    

I am not a guru and some would argue I am not serious either, but is there 
somewhere in the Mozilla settings how much cache and space for 
entries/history it is allowed to use?  I am thinking of Opera here which 
offers you such fine tuning options.

Well, I do have cache set to 500Mbs but I did that so that it could cache images and such on web pages.  I frequent some sites that have a lot of images and since I am on dial-up, very slow dial-up, I like it to store them locally as much as possible.  Over clockers forums is one such site that takes forever to load when I have recently cleared the cache.

I think what is needed here is a limit to the downloads.rdf file's size or something to that effect.  I can say this, I love that it is now faster.  I just wonder how many other people are having this issue and have no clue what is wrong.

Dale

:-)  :-) 
--------------030904090700090902030004-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list