From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1I4VcG-0003tN-4q for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2007 05:35:28 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l5U5YCXA006371; Sat, 30 Jun 2007 05:34:12 GMT Received: from imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net (imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.72]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l5U5U3TJ001756 for ; Sat, 30 Jun 2007 05:30:04 GMT Received: from ibm70aec.bellsouth.net ([216.78.70.162]) by imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20070630053002.CZBS3548.imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm70aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Sat, 30 Jun 2007 01:30:02 -0400 Received: from [216.78.70.162] by ibm70aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20070630053000.EIBP10083.ibm70aec.bellsouth.net@[216.78.70.162]> for ; Sat, 30 Jun 2007 01:30:00 -0400 Message-ID: <4685EA57.1020005@bellsouth.net> Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 00:29:59 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.4) Gecko/20070602 SeaMonkey/1.1.2 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Seamonkey and saving images taking so long References: <4683D4A8.6070707@bellsouth.net> In-Reply-To: <4683D4A8.6070707@bellsouth.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010703080600040105070604" X-Archives-Salt: 24e1c704-81d3-4d2a-85c7-08f265c69082 X-Archives-Hash: 294791fe3a707cc42c2e59e443f52396 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------010703080600040105070604 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dale wrote: > Hi, > > I have a question about this one. I noticed a good while back that > when I try to save a image with Seamonkey, it takes a lot longer than > it used too. I save them this way, right click on the image then > click save image as and in the pop up I click save. After hitting the > save button, it takes several seconds, 5 or so, to save a image to > disk. I always make sure the image is completely loaded since I am on > dial-up. It used to do this really fast and I'm not sure what could > be causing this. It also makes my CPU go to about 80% or so. > > This is some info about my system. AMD 2500+ with 1Gb of ram. I have > a two IDE UDMA drives on this rig. More info: > > << SNIP >> > Open to ideas because this is annoying as heck. Images size doesn't > seem to matter either. Big or large, it takes longer. > > Thanks much. > > Dale > > :-) :-) > > > > I been digging around and sort of came up with a idea. I have a LOT of pictures on this partition. I have pics I have took with my digital camera and some I have got off the net. I have about 38,000 of them. I am using reiserfs on this and was wondering if that could be some of the problem? Too many files or something like that? I also checked to see how fragmented the partition is with a script that I found on the forums a while back. It reports this: > root@smoker / # /root/fragck.pl /data/ > 1.25789432648075% non contiguous files, 1.02978402682122 average > fragments. > root@smoker / # Doesn't look to bad but maybe someone has a better tool too. Any ideas? Is it Seamonkey or something else? Thanks for any help. Dale :-) :-) --------------010703080600040105070604 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dale wrote:
Hi,

I have a question about this one.  I noticed a good while back that when I try to save a image with Seamonkey, it takes a lot longer than it used too.  I save them this way, right click on the image then click save image as and in the pop up I click save.  After hitting the save button, it takes several seconds, 5 or so, to save a image to disk.  I always make sure the image is completely loaded since I am on dial-up.  It used to do this really fast and I'm not sure what could be causing this.  It also makes my CPU go to about 80% or so. 

This is some info about my system.  AMD 2500+ with 1Gb of ram.  I have a two IDE UDMA drives on this rig.  More info:

<< SNIP >>
Open to ideas because this is annoying as heck.  Images size doesn't seem to matter either.  Big or large, it takes longer.

Thanks much.

Dale

:-)  :-)


I been digging around and sort of came up with a idea.  I have a LOT of pictures on this partition.  I have pics I have took with my digital camera and some I have got off the net.  I have about 38,000 of them.  I am using reiserfs on this and was wondering if that could be some of the problem?  Too many files or something like that?

I also checked to see how fragmented the partition is with a script that I found on the forums a while back.  It reports this:

root@smoker / # /root/fragck.pl /data/
1.25789432648075% non contiguous files, 1.02978402682122 average fragments.
root@smoker / # 

Doesn't look to bad but maybe someone has a better tool too. 

Any ideas?  Is it Seamonkey or something else?

Thanks for any help.

Dale

:-)  :-)

--------------010703080600040105070604-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list