From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HwxgE-0002Gt-9Z for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 09 Jun 2007 09:56:23 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l599ro3f003483; Sat, 9 Jun 2007 09:53:50 GMT Received: from mirus.exceedtech.net (ns0.exceedtech.net [70.151.169.5]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l599kRIo025618 for ; Sat, 9 Jun 2007 09:46:28 GMT Received: from [4.230.219.223] (dialup-4.230.219.223.Dial1.Houston1.Level3.net [4.230.219.223]) by mirus.exceedtech.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id l599kOqj005700 for ; Sat, 9 Jun 2007 04:46:25 -0500 Message-ID: <466A76F2.9010909@exceedtech.net> Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2007 04:46:26 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.4) Gecko/20070602 SeaMonkey/1.1.2 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Again: Critical bugs considered invalid References: <200706062034.23922.davividal@siscompar.com.br> <200706090129.37942.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> <200706090249.50881.zachary.grafton@gmail.com> <8cd1ed20706090205m444b0cb9l45556168b19404d6@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8cd1ed20706090205m444b0cb9l45556168b19404d6@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id l599ro3x003483 X-Archives-Salt: b7787ae5-32ae-448f-b5d1-b440aae966ea X-Archives-Hash: a2ee8dfb7f48f55fe3507c83aec92b8e Kent Fredric wrote: > On 6/9/07, Zachary Grafton wrote: >> On Friday 08 June 2007 19:29, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: >> > On Samstag, 9. Juni 2007, =BBQ=AB wrote: >> > > In , >> > > >> > > "Hemmann, Volker Armin" >> wrote: >> > > > On Freitag, 8. Juni 2007, Alexander Skwar wrote: >> > > > > b.n. wrote: >> > > > > > Really. If you think there's a problem, explain it. You get >> > > > > > attacked? Insist. Prove them they are wrong. >> > > > > >> > > > > Just curious: Did you ever try this with Jakub? >> > > > >> > > > I did. >> > > > >> > > > And after some arguments a different dev came in and recognized >> the >> > > > bug as a real bug... >> > > >> > > I've seen that happen a few times. IME, jakub is usually right, b= ut >> > > whether he's right or wrong he's very stubborn. It's possible to >> > > wrangle the bug yourself, asking another dev to have a look at it, >> > > instead of arguing with Jakub until somebody notices. >> > >> > Jakub is like a spam filter who filters out 100% of the spam. >> Sadly, he >> > filters a fair amount of ham too - and if your ham got filtered the >> option >> > to get it recognized as ham are hard to find and not easy to use ;) >> > >> > His user interface could be improved.... >> >> Maybe someone should submit a bug report.... > > http://www.xkcd.com/c258.html > > I tried . Critical bug, but was considered 'invalid' by the > prayer-wranglers. > > > Let me guess, Jakub closed it? LOL=20 Can I also assume he decided to stay? I read he was leaving a while back. Dale :-) :-) :-) --=20 gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list