From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HwP8L-00022D-4f for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2007 21:03:05 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l57L1KBc006391; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 21:01:20 GMT Received: from aa013msr.fastwebnet.it (aa013msr.fastwebnet.it [85.18.95.73]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l57Kue50032354 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 20:56:41 GMT Received: from [37.1.3.90] (37.1.3.90) by aa013msr.fastwebnet.it (7.3.118.6) (authenticated as cyclopia) id 4665782A0025DB6A for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 22:56:40 +0200 Message-ID: <466891E6.2070609@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 23:16:54 +0000 From: "b.n." User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070520) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid References: <20070605150742.GB7993@nibiru.local> <20070605160739.GA21746@crowfix.com> <4665F834.3000302@gmail.com> <20070606215938.GA20041@crowfix.com> In-Reply-To: <20070606215938.GA20041@crowfix.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 9df77050-d279-4586-ae1a-5d5660e45941 X-Archives-Hash: 128b079c903e9fe0a2fa42ff59842c8e felix@crowfix.com ha scritto: > Complaining TWICE worked. Is it so bad? I'd say complaining ten times would be bad, but twice seems a reasonable number of attempts. > The problem I complained about shouldn't > have happened in the first place; someonex fixed something that wasn't > broken and made it broken. Bugs! What an awkward occurrence in the world of programming! And, even more unusual, people who should improve programs... introduce new bugs too! Alas! They even have a word for these "incredibly rare" kind of bugs: regressions. They are as common as shit, my friend. I just discovered two of them, today, in the data analysis software I code in my lab :) Probably someone fixed something that WAS broken but, doing that, also unfixed something else. In programming, often, tightening a string somewhere looses it somewhere else. Bug fixing is harder than programming itself. > Your response is absolutely typical of my problem with the gentoo dev > community. You misstate a complaint, overreact to it, and apparently > feel pretty smug about your accomplishment. Where did I misstate (?) a complaint? Where did I overreact? And where did I feel smug about it? You had perfectly legit complaints. I (we) just told you what the correct procedure to get solved is. Note:maybe it won't get them solved, I agree. But ranting is not a way either. All you can logically do is try again to follow the procedure, or fix them yourself. There's nothing else you can do. Really. > No one will admit to the > two screwups (first breaking a working ebuild, second incorrectly > closing a bug on it). Instead you lash out at those who point out > problems. I fully, completely admit the screwups! What you fail to understand is that they're common everyday problems that will always occur on a large project like an operating system distribution, and that there are methods to fix them most of the time. > Yes, I had the wrong program when I compalined about the color > problem. But the gentoo community response then as now was to lash > out, scream and shout, not to actually investigate. What there was to "investigate"? First, we are NOT the community that must "investigate", since we're users, not devels. Ask devels to "investigate". Second, your problem was not something like, say, "X freezing, no error messages, where could I look?", but more like "colours ugly as hell, wtf why don't they change them". What is there to investigate about that? Everyone not colour-blind on this list knows what colours has emerge: investigation finished. Third, you actually already did all the investigation possible. You, IIRC: -looked at emerge code -didn't like that (probably rightly so) -told yourself they're too dumb to even understand a complain (not rightly so, IMHO) -rant on gentoo-users Really, what should have we done? It is not a rhetoric question: I just don't understand. If you can tell me an example of what should we have done, I'm really and sincerely happy to hear it. > And when I > finally left the thread alone, you geniuses were still ranting about > it three days later when I next checked. That's a good point. We can't resist flamebaits, that's all. :) But so, what has it to do with the problem? > You folks may think you have a cool system, and it is in some ways and > could be in many others. But I know many people who tried gentoo and > bailed precisely because of the shoot the messenger mentality so > pervasive here; the self-selected sample you see is meaningless. Well, I tell you a secret: even with all its quirks and defects, Gentoo has one of the more friendly and helpful communities in the OSS world. Try have a look at the Debian, OpenBSD or Slackware forums/ml/IRC channels, and you'll understand. > Go ahead, have another three days' fun. Maybe I'll spark some more > tinders in a month or two. I wouldn't want to deprive you of your > fun. I can't understand your sarcasm. It's you that put flamebaits in the forests -how can you blame us for the fire? :) m. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list