From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HpwZr-0001as-CJ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 21 May 2007 01:20:47 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l4L1JV92013784; Mon, 21 May 2007 01:19:31 GMT Received: from www01.badapple.net (www01.badapple.net [64.79.219.163]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l4L1FGAi009156 for ; Mon, 21 May 2007 01:15:16 GMT Received: from [192.168.54.100] (c-24-5-44-67.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.5.44.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ramin@badapple.net) by www01.badapple.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B31C120028 for ; Sun, 20 May 2007 18:15:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4650F29D.6000607@badapple.net> Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 18:15:09 -0700 From: kashani User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo gets as bad SuSE: Circular dependencies [WAS: Thank you Gentoo devs] References: <464A9A30.9060707@omesc.com> <2fcf3fa50705160551g61ec4fb0g241675da8061d873@mail.gmail.com> <20070516142312.GA31409@nibiru.local> <20070516155413.1d50da26@hactar.digimed.co.uk> <20070516154736.GA18410@nibiru.local> <20070516231729.3acfc4cf@hactar.digimed.co.uk> <20070517160321.GB16099@nibiru.local> <20070518112939.0b67b7e2@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> <8cd1ed20705182000i3771a2e6j86af89038778abde@mail.gmail.com> <20070520164931.GB25758@nibiru.local> In-Reply-To: <20070520164931.GB25758@nibiru.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 58ab20e6-533a-48bc-8e95-bc3fd5bb853f X-Archives-Hash: b90182078dc2886283be74e370b57f95 Enrico Weigelt wrote: > BTW: some people expressed (within this thread), that Gentoo was too > easy to use and should be made more complicated. Funny, isn't it ? No, that is not funny, but I'll tell you what is humorous. That all three posters involved in saying Gentoo was too easy were speaking sarcastically and then watching you try to use it to prove some point other than the obvious fact that you have no idea what you're talking about. That my friend is pure comedy. kashani -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list