* [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel
@ 2006-04-05 22:00 Tamas Sarga
2006-04-05 23:47 ` JimD
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Tamas Sarga @ 2006-04-05 22:00 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Hi,
I had nvidia-kernel-8178-r3 and nvidia-glx-8178. Now the latest
nvidia-kernel is 8174-r1 with ~x86 keyword. Do anybody knows where
nvidia-kernel-8178-r3 disappeared, and why. It is simply disappeared
from the repository, I don't find it in /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask.
TIA.
Tamas Sarga
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel
2006-04-05 22:00 [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel Tamas Sarga
@ 2006-04-05 23:47 ` JimD
2006-04-09 12:00 ` Tamas Sarga
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: JimD @ 2006-04-05 23:47 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Wed, April 5, 2006 6:00 pm, Tamas Sarga wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I had nvidia-kernel-8178-r3 and nvidia-glx-8178. Now the latest
> nvidia-kernel is 8174-r1 with ~x86 keyword. Do anybody knows where
> nvidia-kernel-8178-r3 disappeared, and why. It is simply disappeared
> from the repository, I don't find it in /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask.
>
> TIA.
> Tamas Sarga
I just did a sync 1 minute ago and here is what I got:
total 122K
drwxr-xr-x 3 portage portage 544 Mar 24 17:06 ./
drwxr-xr-x 170 portage portage 4.5K Apr 5 19:07 ../
-rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage 35K Mar 24 17:06 ChangeLog
-rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage 21K Mar 24 17:06 Manifest
drwxr-xr-x 10 portage portage 648 Apr 5 19:07 files/
-rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage 313 Apr 25 2005 metadata.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage 4.5K Oct 28 03:35 nvidia-kernel-1.0.6111-r3.ebuild
-rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage 4.7K Jan 10 14:59 nvidia-kernel-1.0.6629-r5.ebuild
-rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage 3.9K Oct 28 03:35 nvidia-kernel-1.0.7167-r1.ebuild
-rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage 4.2K Jan 24 10:03 nvidia-kernel-1.0.7174-r2.ebuild
-rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage 4.5K Oct 28 03:35 nvidia-kernel-1.0.7667.ebuild
-rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage 4.6K Oct 28 03:19 nvidia-kernel-1.0.7676-r1.ebuild
-rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage 3.5K Dec 7 16:32 nvidia-kernel-1.0.8174-r1.ebuild
-rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage 3.6K Mar 24 15:36 nvidia-kernel-1.0.8178-r3.ebuild
Maybe try to sync again?
Jim
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
I'm a geek, but I don't get it. 36-24-36 = -24. What's the significance?
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Florida, USA, Earth, Solar System, Milky Way
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel
2006-04-05 23:47 ` JimD
@ 2006-04-09 12:00 ` Tamas Sarga
2006-04-09 19:20 ` Manuel McLure
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Tamas Sarga @ 2006-04-09 12:00 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
JimD wrote:
> On Wed, April 5, 2006 6:00 pm, Tamas Sarga wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> I had nvidia-kernel-8178-r3 and nvidia-glx-8178. Now the latest
>> nvidia-kernel is 8174-r1 with ~x86 keyword. Do anybody knows where
>> nvidia-kernel-8178-r3 disappeared, and why. It is simply disappeared
>> from the repository, I don't find it in /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask.
>>
>> TIA.
>> Tamas Sarga
>>
>
> I just did a sync 1 minute ago and here is what I got:
>
> total 122K
> drwxr-xr-x 3 portage portage 544 Mar 24 17:06 ./
> drwxr-xr-x 170 portage portage 4.5K Apr 5 19:07 ../
> -rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage 35K Mar 24 17:06 ChangeLog
> -rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage 21K Mar 24 17:06 Manifest
> drwxr-xr-x 10 portage portage 648 Apr 5 19:07 files/
> -rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage 313 Apr 25 2005 metadata.xml
> -rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage 4.5K Oct 28 03:35 nvidia-kernel-1.0.6111-r3.ebuild
> -rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage 4.7K Jan 10 14:59 nvidia-kernel-1.0.6629-r5.ebuild
> -rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage 3.9K Oct 28 03:35 nvidia-kernel-1.0.7167-r1.ebuild
> -rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage 4.2K Jan 24 10:03 nvidia-kernel-1.0.7174-r2.ebuild
> -rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage 4.5K Oct 28 03:35 nvidia-kernel-1.0.7667.ebuild
> -rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage 4.6K Oct 28 03:19 nvidia-kernel-1.0.7676-r1.ebuild
> -rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage 3.5K Dec 7 16:32 nvidia-kernel-1.0.8174-r1.ebuild
> -rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage 3.6K Mar 24 15:36 nvidia-kernel-1.0.8178-r3.ebuild
>
> Maybe try to sync again?
>
> Jim
>
Hi,
I synced just now.
# ls /usr/portage/media-video/nvidia-kernel/
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 35048 Apr 8 06:09 ChangeLog
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5901 Apr 8 06:09 Manifest
drwxr-xr-x 10 root root 4096 Apr 9 12:37 files
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 313 Apr 25 2005 metadata.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4523 Oct 28 09:35 nvidia-kernel-1.0.6111-r3.ebuild
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4772 Jan 10 20:59 nvidia-kernel-1.0.6629-r5.ebuild
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3982 Oct 28 09:35 nvidia-kernel-1.0.7167-r1.ebuild
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4277 Jan 24 16:03 nvidia-kernel-1.0.7174-r2.ebuild
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4538 Oct 28 09:35 nvidia-kernel-1.0.7667.ebuild
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4669 Oct 28 09:19 nvidia-kernel-1.0.7676-r1.ebuild
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3584 Dec 7 22:32 nvidia-kernel-1.0.8174-r1.ebuild
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3585 Mar 24 21:36 nvidia-kernel-1.0.8178-r3.ebuild
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3540 Apr 8 05:45 nvidia-kernel-1.0.8756.ebuild
So yes, the ebuild is there, but
#equery l -p nvidia-kernel
[ Searching for package 'nvidia-kernel' in all categories among: ]
* installed packages
[I--] [M ] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.8178-r3 (0)
* Portage tree (/usr/portage)
[-P-] [ -] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.6111-r3 (0)
[-P-] [ -] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.6629-r5 (0)
[-P-] [M~] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.7167-r1 (0)
[-P-] [M~] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.7174-r2 (0)
[-P-] [M~] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.7667 (0)
[-P-] [M~] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.7676-r1 (0)
[-P-] [M~] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.8174-r1 (0)
[-P-] [ ~] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.8756 (0)
So I must move somewhere. Portage suggested downgrade, because I
keyworded nvidia-kernel by version.
Anyway, I keyworded 1.0.8756. I will see what will happen.
But I don't see the reasons, why emerge doesn't see 1.0.8178-r3.
2 minutes later:
Sorry, I realized just now, that it is hardmasked. So the question has
changed. How can I figure out why it was hardmasked?
/usr/portage/profiles/package.mask doesn't contain it.
TIA.
Tamas Sarga
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel
2006-04-09 12:00 ` Tamas Sarga
@ 2006-04-09 19:20 ` Manuel McLure
2006-04-10 21:48 ` Tamas Sarga
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Manuel McLure @ 2006-04-09 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Tamas Sarga wrote:
> So yes, the ebuild is there, but
> #equery l -p nvidia-kernel
> [ Searching for package 'nvidia-kernel' in all categories among: ]
> * installed packages
> [I--] [M ] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.8178-r3 (0)
> * Portage tree (/usr/portage)
> [-P-] [ -] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.6111-r3 (0)
> [-P-] [ -] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.6629-r5 (0)
> [-P-] [M~] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.7167-r1 (0)
> [-P-] [M~] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.7174-r2 (0)
> [-P-] [M~] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.7667 (0)
> [-P-] [M~] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.7676-r1 (0)
> [-P-] [M~] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.8174-r1 (0)
> [-P-] [ ~] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.8756 (0)
Something's strange with your portage tree. I just did the same after a
sync:
$ equery l -p nvidia-kernel
[ Searching for package 'nvidia-kernel' in all categories among: ]
* installed packages
[I--] [ ~] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.8756 (0)
* Portage tree (/usr/portage)
[-P-] [ -] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.6111-r3 (0)
[-P-] [ -] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.6629-r5 (0)
[-P-] [ ~] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.7167-r1 (0)
[-P-] [ ~] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.7174-r2 (0)
[-P-] [ ~] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.7667 (0)
[-P-] [ ~] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.7676-r1 (0)
[-P-] [ ~] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.8174-r1 (0)
[-P-] [ ~] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.8178-r3 (0)
Are you sure you don't have anything in /etc/portage/package.mask that
may be blocking?
Also, try "emerge --metadata" to rebuild the portage cache.
--
Manuel A. McLure KE6TAW <manuel@mclure.org> <http://www.mclure.org>
...for in Ulthar, according to an ancient and significant law,
no man may kill a cat. -- H.P. Lovecraft
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel
2006-04-09 19:20 ` Manuel McLure
@ 2006-04-10 21:48 ` Tamas Sarga
2006-04-10 22:18 ` Richard Fish
2006-04-11 3:36 ` Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Tamas Sarga @ 2006-04-10 21:48 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Manuel McLure wrote:
> Tamas Sarga wrote:
>> So yes, the ebuild is there, but
>> #equery l -p nvidia-kernel
>> [ Searching for package 'nvidia-kernel' in all categories among: ]
>> * installed packages
>> [I--] [M ] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.8178-r3 (0)
>> * Portage tree (/usr/portage)
>> [-P-] [ -] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.6111-r3 (0)
>> [-P-] [ -] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.6629-r5 (0)
>> [-P-] [M~] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.7167-r1 (0)
>> [-P-] [M~] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.7174-r2 (0)
>> [-P-] [M~] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.7667 (0)
>> [-P-] [M~] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.7676-r1 (0)
>> [-P-] [M~] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.8174-r1 (0)
>> [-P-] [ ~] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.8756 (0)
>
> Something's strange with your portage tree. I just did the same after a
> sync:
>
> $ equery l -p nvidia-kernel
> [ Searching for package 'nvidia-kernel' in all categories among: ]
> * installed packages
> [I--] [ ~] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.8756 (0)
> * Portage tree (/usr/portage)
> [-P-] [ -] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.6111-r3 (0)
> [-P-] [ -] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.6629-r5 (0)
> [-P-] [ ~] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.7167-r1 (0)
> [-P-] [ ~] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.7174-r2 (0)
> [-P-] [ ~] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.7667 (0)
> [-P-] [ ~] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.7676-r1 (0)
> [-P-] [ ~] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.8174-r1 (0)
> [-P-] [ ~] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.8178-r3 (0)
>
> Are you sure you don't have anything in /etc/portage/package.mask that
> may be blocking?
>
> Also, try "emerge --metadata" to rebuild the portage cache.
>
Hi,
I did emerge --metadata and eupdatedb, but nothing has changed. My
package.mask is empty. I can't understand why it is masked on my
machine. I'm on x86 and I looked at packages.gentoo.org, it isn't masked
there. My /etc/make.profile links to
../usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2005.0/.
What did it? In /etc/portage/ just one file, the package.keywords
contains nvidia-kernel.
TIA.
Tamas Sarga
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEOtKm2hT1i1vMtiURAjJXAJ98eNpMB1voFH4x6TY48Uk4PmOJ1gCdFhf+
SpXJsnFsTS/w+3xaeHmCnxg=
=0kvK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel
2006-04-10 21:48 ` Tamas Sarga
@ 2006-04-10 22:18 ` Richard Fish
2006-04-11 19:13 ` Tamas Sarga
2006-04-11 3:36 ` Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Richard Fish @ 2006-04-10 22:18 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
> What did it? In /etc/portage/ just one file, the package.keywords
> contains nvidia-kernel.
What exactly does /etc/portage/package.keywords contain? It should be:
media-video/nvidia-kernel ~x86
-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel
2006-04-10 22:18 ` Richard Fish
@ 2006-04-11 19:13 ` Tamas Sarga
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Tamas Sarga @ 2006-04-11 19:13 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
It contains
=media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.8756 ~x86
=media-video/nvidia-glx-1.0.8756 ~x86
now. It contained the 8178-r3 version, because I needed it for some
purpose, but I don't want to upgrade at every testing ebuild. I just
wanted that ebuild, wait for stabilizing, and follow the stabil version
further.
TIA.
Tamas Sarga
Richard Fish wrote:
>> What did it? In /etc/portage/ just one file, the package.keywords
>> contains nvidia-kernel.
>
> What exactly does /etc/portage/package.keywords contain? It should be:
>
> media-video/nvidia-kernel ~x86
>
> -Richard
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEO//G2hT1i1vMtiURAmZqAJ0f9513yEIE4PwE1tNCAofWl+YRrgCfS1GE
mvqgh6U60cUB/ytQp02aPBU=
=96S7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel
2006-04-10 21:48 ` Tamas Sarga
2006-04-10 22:18 ` Richard Fish
@ 2006-04-11 3:36 ` Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2006-04-11 19:49 ` Tamas Sarga
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. @ 2006-04-11 3:36 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 551 bytes --]
On Monday 10 April 2006 16:48, Tamas Sarga <tamas.sarga2@gmail.com> wrote
about 'Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel':
> My /etc/make.profile links to
> ../usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2005.0/.
That's a little bit old but not deprecated. You might try upgrading, but I
really don't think that's your issue.
--
"If there's one thing we've established over the years,
it's that the vast majority of our users don't have the slightest
clue what's best for them in terms of package stability."
-- Gentoo Developer Ciaran McCreesh
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 191 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel
2006-04-11 3:36 ` Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
@ 2006-04-11 19:49 ` Tamas Sarga
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Tamas Sarga @ 2006-04-11 19:49 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> On Monday 10 April 2006 16:48, Tamas Sarga <tamas.sarga2@gmail.com> wrote
> about 'Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel':
>> My /etc/make.profile links to
>> ../usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2005.0/.
>
> That's a little bit old but not deprecated. You might try upgrading, but I
> really don't think that's your issue.
>
Hi,
I relink make.profile, did an emerge --metapackage && eupdatedb, but
nothing change.
Did I miss anything with profile update?
TIA.
Tamas Sarga
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEPAgq2hT1i1vMtiURAv5SAJ4kYSRDsF/nG/zyu88wjwxYyUtY3QCfUq1g
d0ickUpWeoObx26ryF0uHes=
=smpN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-04-11 19:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-04-05 22:00 [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel Tamas Sarga
2006-04-05 23:47 ` JimD
2006-04-09 12:00 ` Tamas Sarga
2006-04-09 19:20 ` Manuel McLure
2006-04-10 21:48 ` Tamas Sarga
2006-04-10 22:18 ` Richard Fish
2006-04-11 19:13 ` Tamas Sarga
2006-04-11 3:36 ` Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2006-04-11 19:49 ` Tamas Sarga
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox