From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6AF71382C5 for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 09:26:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 87690E08AD; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 09:26:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gw2.antarean.org (gw2.antarean.org [141.105.125.208]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C540E088B for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 09:26:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gw2.antarean.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FwgRZ1gWzz8vWn for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 11:23:06 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at antarean.org Received: from gw2.antarean.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gw2.antarean.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jPkUrkoWvWru for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 11:23:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailstore1.adm.antarean.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gw2.antarean.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FwgRY5dcTz8vWm for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 11:23:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailstore1.adm.antarean.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FwgWk3k9Yz15 for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 11:26:42 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at antarean.org Received: from mailstore1.adm.antarean.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailstore1.adm.antarean.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r-SRPkAqwyQp for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 11:26:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from iris.localnet (iris.adm.antarean.org [10.55.16.47]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mailstore1.adm.antarean.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FwgWk2VMVzj for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 11:26:42 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=antarean.org; s=default; t=1622712402; bh=C5Dxhnd+AorLiZzU8220abdHcdoVXOhcVsSyPOGd7FE=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=IgpfA8l3fYuaTC6vkoWGf9iHJl0q7COco+m1QqGIioxoVHNV/5szfbsCnRyKtQAjH WBHoB/9kLod654Zpt6Duc2ONUpJ1ic955t/ONmOu+/bKkIJ5lh8/Lp2woFo7IDbEcU T679d9WBmUQyXFQFfOr0ALn35kj5HjfQvKFKkdr8= From: "J. Roeleveld" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] is "scp" reliable? Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2021 11:26:42 +0200 Message-ID: <4627561.GXAFRqVoOG@iris> In-Reply-To: <8512ace4-dcc3-af17-499c-7a791925fa1e@web.de> References: <1eee5cf4-9234-07cf-4b83-7de431483d51@sys-concept.com> <2596776.mvXUDI8C0e@iris> <8512ace4-dcc3-af17-499c-7a791925fa1e@web.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Archives-Salt: 26c5b899-0d8f-476c-9004-d52eabdfae3c X-Archives-Hash: 53e2c13e6a27c6bfbea4faedfcda658b On Tuesday, June 1, 2021 6:21:52 PM CEST n952162 wrote: > On 6/1/21 6:42 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote: > > If there are differences, I would definitely suspect memory and CPU. > > > > -- > > Joost > > CPU? USB was mentioned which set off alarm bells for me. In general > though, I would suspect the media - either source of destination. The issue was first seen using SCP-copies. Eg, over network. USB was only mentioned as being used as an alternative, which also didn't work. -- Joost