Neil Bothwick wrote:
> Hello Daniel Iliev,
>
>   
>> Actually I'd be glad to read some results from a "Fake RAID-0 vs LVM"
>> tests. My bet would be that RAID-0 w/o LVM would give the best speeds
>>     
>
> Omitting LVM isn't an option, I'd lose all the flexibility that LVM
> offers. I don't see why RAID-0 should be necessarily more efficient than
> LVM, unless there's something superior about RAID-0's striping
> algorithms. I could do some before and after tests, but I'd first have the
> reformat the filesystems to remove any effects of fragmentation.
>
> If no one comes up with a good reason for keeping the RAID, I'll get rid
> of it, running bonnie++ before and after.
>
>
>   

Hi, Neil!

Out of curiosity I made some tests which confirmed my expectations. What
about you - did you have time (and wish) to take some performance
benchmarks? I would be glad to see some additional results.

I'm attaching my tests in file called "bench.txt".


-- 
Best regards,
Daniel