From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HLY2x-0005Mq-61 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 05:05:11 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l1Q53vgX018548; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 05:03:57 GMT Received: from laptop (ppp161-104.adsl.forthnet.gr [194.219.44.104]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l1Q4xhpe013379 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 04:59:44 GMT Received: from [192.168.0.2] (laptop.vergina.dyndns.org [192.168.0.2]) by laptop (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A33117C304 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 06:59:42 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <45E26939.9010000@vergina.dyndns.org> Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 06:59:37 +0200 From: Agg User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070218) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] off topic : Dolphin massacre in Japan References: <45DC860B.102@freemail.gr> <20070225222704.GB6227@princeton.edu> <45E211A6.6080406@vergina.dyndns.org> <200702252322.16007.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200702252322.16007.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-7 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 2c7137f4-7d81-4333-a63c-76f11dbcc6b1 X-Archives-Hash: 47be3b93ea6d7d922d9ba2b7eb541c4f on 02/26/2007 01:22 AM Mick wrote the following: > On Sunday 25 February 2007 22:45, Agg wrote: >> on 02/26/2007 12:27 AM Willie Wong wrote the following: >>> On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 11:38:35PM +0200, Penguin Lover Agg squawked: >>>> You mean an *off-topic* with a valid reply-to address is still >>>> *off-topic*. >>> Oh, come on, why can't you have the decency to spam^H post off-topic >>> from just one e-mail account? It is annoying to have to kill-file >>> multiple ones. >> If you had the decency to accept off-topic as off-topic, spam as spam, >> simple as simple, and hypocrisy as hypocrisy... > > You seem to be evidently void of any sense of relevance and proportionality. Speak for yourself: made a thread out of something *you* call spam. (1) > This is a 'gentoo-user' mailing list intended to serve the needs of > gentoo-users; specific support and discussion needs which are relevant to the > Gentoo meta-distribution. Had you been around for any length of time you > would have observed the fact that "off-topic" on this list is invariably > still relevant to IT, computers, Linux and related topics. > > After many people told you that your topic is considered irrelevant spam for > this list and that you are consuming unnecessary bandwidth, you continue to > annoy with your persistence to spam. You are. I 'm replying. > Exhibiting a messianic zeal for a good > cause in this inappropriate way, has ended up causing a disservice to an > otherwise laudable cause. (1) > Your ends do not justify your means and in this > case label you as fanatic idiot - because you have no sense of relevance, > proportionality and respect for your audience. (1) > > Couldn't you just find a *suitable* ML to raise your issue They should be aware of it. > and leave us alone? You don't have to reply to something *you* want to call spam. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list