From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HLXap-0002Vb-Il for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 04:36:08 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l1Q4YuiS010174; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 04:34:56 GMT Received: from laptop (ppp161-104.adsl.forthnet.gr [194.219.44.104]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l1Q4UWAO005123 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 04:30:33 GMT Received: from [192.168.0.2] (laptop.vergina.dyndns.org [192.168.0.2]) by laptop (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CB7517C304 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 06:30:30 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <45E26263.20003@vergina.dyndns.org> Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 06:30:27 +0200 From: Agg User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070218) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] off topic : Dolphin massacre in Japan References: <45DC860B.102@freemail.gr> <40646.192.168.1.200.1172238275.squirrel@webmail.bensa.ar> <45DEFDD9.7030305@exceedtech.net> <200702232007.29452.nbensa@gmx.net> <428c4cda0702240951v61376c10ye2127a6016d2ca32@mail.gmail.com> <45E1F883.6020402@vergina.dyndns.org> <45E1FC4B.4080206@paradise.net.nz> <45E201DB.8060706@vergina.dyndns.org> <45E214A0.5030006@paradise.net.nz> In-Reply-To: <45E214A0.5030006@paradise.net.nz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: bf9c7a6c-4ad1-48a9-9d9c-cbff056a1e58 X-Archives-Hash: a374b82461505bd2b6ba98ff6491397a on 02/26/2007 12:58 AM Mark Kirkwood wrote the following: > Agg wrote: >> on 02/25/2007 11:14 PM Mark Kirkwood wrote the following: >>> Agg wrote: >>> >>>> All those that replied wouldn't reply if it were an actual "spam". >>>> An off-topic is not necessarily spam. And that's exactly the specific >>>> case. >>>> >>> Spam with a valid reply-to address is still spam. >> >> You mean an *off-topic* with a valid reply-to address is still >> *off-topic*. >> >> > > No - I meant spam... off-topic in this particular case -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list