From: Daniel Pielmeier <daniel.pielmeier@googlemail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Performance problem at writing big files and Multitasking
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 22:39:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45CA4708.9010307@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45C9F7A1.10806@comcast.net>
> The hdparm optimizations, the CFQ scheduler and maybe low latency
> desktop in the kernel are the best way to make your desktop useable
> under heavy disk usage.These are my hdparm settings:
>
> /dev/hda:
> multcount = 16 (on)
> IO_support = 1 (32-bit)
> unmaskirq = 1 (on)
> using_dma = 1 (on)
> keepsettings = 0 (off)
> readonly = 0 (off)
> readahead = 256 (on)
> geometry = 26310/16/63, sectors = 26520480, start = 0
>
> cat /sys/block/hda/queue/scheduler
> noop [cfq]
>
> Linux c-68-85-77-239 2.6.20-gentoo #4 PREEMPT Tue Feb 6 17:03:56 EST
> 2007 i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2000+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
Now i am in front of my PC. I already use the cfq scheduler and have
low latency desktop enabled. I looked at the output of hdparm -I
/dev/sda and all seems to be ok by default.
> And check you have HZ set to 1000.
>
> $ grep HZ /usr/src/linux/.config
> # CONFIG_HZ_100 is not set
> # CONFIG_HZ_250 is not set
> CONFIG_HZ_1000=y
> CONFIG_HZ=1000
Thanks i will check if this helps, i have just set 250 HZ for timer
frequency.
> Could your problem be similar to this:
>
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=gentoo-user&m=114252338111258&w=2
>
>
> Tom
Maybe, today the gentoo-sources-2.6.19-r5 become stable so i will try
the new kernel. I am also waiting for kernel 2.6.20 as it has a setting
for the core 2 duo in processor settings. Maybe i try the testing
version of it.
Also the new gcc compilers will support the core 2 duo directly, but i
think it will take some time till 4.2 or even 4.3 will become stable.
I show up here again and tell you if something improves the performance
of my system.
Regards
Daniel
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-07 21:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <7LFgI-6qK-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <7LFqt-6Eo-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <7LUIK-4Qn-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
2007-02-07 16:00 ` [gentoo-user] Performance problem at writing big files and Multitasking Mike
2007-02-07 16:39 ` Daniel Pielmeier
2007-02-07 18:08 ` Benno Schulenberg
2007-02-07 21:39 ` Daniel Pielmeier [this message]
2007-02-10 11:49 ` Daniel Pielmeier
2007-02-26 16:28 ` Matthias Bethke
2007-02-27 7:49 ` Kellystewart00
2007-02-06 20:31 Daniel Pielmeier
2007-02-06 20:50 ` Michael Schreckenbauer
2007-02-06 21:25 ` Daniel Pielmeier
2007-02-06 21:16 ` Etaoin Shrdlu
2007-02-06 21:28 ` Daniel Pielmeier
2007-02-08 10:42 ` Frédéric Grosshans
2007-02-08 18:34 ` Daniel Pielmeier
2007-02-08 19:12 ` Etaoin Shrdlu
2007-02-08 23:14 ` Iain Buchanan
2007-02-06 22:25 ` Daniel Pielmeier
2007-02-07 12:59 ` Daniel Pielmeier
2007-02-07 19:16 ` Tom Naujokas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45CA4708.9010307@googlemail.com \
--to=daniel.pielmeier@googlemail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox