From: Dale <dalek@exceedtech.net>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Most important packages to save buildpkg of
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 00:12:51 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45B455E3.70002@exceedtech.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200701211425.21336.bss03@volumehost.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2183 bytes --]
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> On Sunday 21 January 2007 09:55, Dale <dalek@exceedtech.net> wrote
> about '[gentoo-user] Most important packages to save buildpkg of':
>
>> Every once in a blue moon I screw up something. I don't know why I am
>> telling you this. I come here mostly for help. LOL So you already now
>> that. I have buildpkg set in make.conf. It does tend to consume some
>> space though. What is say the top ten or twelve programs that would be
>> good to have in case of a rescue? I would assume portage, gcc and
>> python would be pretty important. I plan to delete the rest for space.
>>
>
> Keep a glibc and binutils around as well. Have busybox *installed*,
> statically linked. pam, acl and your favorite non-X11 editor would be my
> next additions to the package list. Then, to round out the 10-12 add all
> the packages that provide your file system (e2fstools, reiserfstools,
> etc.) and block device (LVM, EVMS, etc.) tools.
>
I have busybox installed. I wonder where that came from. :/ This is
what it says the flags are:
> [ebuild R ] sys-apps/busybox-1.2.2.1 USE="-debug -make-symlinks
> -netboot -savedconfig -static" 1,380 kB
Those correct? I would hate to bork something and then find out busybox
is installed wrong. It would be my luck though.
>
>> Also, what commands would a person have to use to make use of those
>> buildpkg's? So far, I have not needed one. < says prayer > That
>> assumes portage is what is screwed up to begin with.
>>
>
> All you need is tar. You simply extract the compressed tarball over your
> root file system and the package is installed, but not entered into the
> vdb (so, it wouldn't be a bad idea to re-emerge it once you get portage
> back up).
>
> If you glibc gets screwed up, your standard tar will probably just die on
> you, which is why I mentioned a statically linked busybox as something to
> install. Busybox can function as both a shell (if bash starts misbehaving
> cause readline, glibc, or something else it links to is broken) and tar,
> as well as a host of other programs.
>
>
Thanks
Dale
:-) :-)
--
www.myspace.com/dalek1967
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3089 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-22 6:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-21 15:55 [gentoo-user] Most important packages to save buildpkg of Dale
2007-01-21 20:25 ` Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2007-01-22 1:16 ` Neil Bothwick
2007-01-22 6:14 ` Dale
2007-01-22 6:12 ` Dale [this message]
2007-01-22 12:46 ` Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2007-01-21 22:46 ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2007-01-22 6:22 ` Dale
2007-01-22 11:34 ` Neil Bothwick
2007-01-22 7:34 ` Alan McKinnon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45B455E3.70002@exceedtech.net \
--to=dalek@exceedtech.net \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox