From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-58128-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
	id 1H4Set-0006P9-Gk
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:53:43 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id l0A1pqDP031319;
	Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:51:52 GMT
Received: from smtp5.clear.net.nz (smtp5.clear.net.nz [203.97.33.68])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0A1iGxJ009795
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:44:17 GMT
Received: from [192.168.1.11]
 (121-72-72-51.dsl.telstraclear.net [121.72.72.51]) by smtp5.clear.net.nz
 (CLEAR Net Mail) with ESMTP id <0JBM006JGQ5QFR00@smtp5.clear.net.nz> for
 gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:44:15 +1300 (NZDT)
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:44:01 +1300
From: Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] gcc slots
In-reply-to: <20070110013244.490c5def@hactar.digimed.co.uk>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Message-id: <45A444E1.3030503@paradise.net.nz>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
References: <200701092329.17667.michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
 <20070109174621.5a242791@pascal.spore.ath.cx>
 <20070110013244.490c5def@hactar.digimed.co.uk>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061227)
X-Archives-Salt: 894359a6-4acc-4fcb-ad0a-36ef41814d70
X-Archives-Hash: 46a3c309eafdb5e491f7701f72fa43e3

Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:46:21 -0600, Dan wrote:
> 
>> Whether the reply text goes before or after the message to which it
>> replies depends entirely on personal preferance.
> 
> writer!
> the
> not
> reader,
> the
> of
> preference
> personal
> the
> on
> depends
> it
> but
> Yes,
> 
> Top-post even Yoda wouldn't.
> 
> 

What is really evil is when some folks have top posted and other's 
bottom posted in the same message...

Hard
read
to
it
makes
it

That's why most mailing lists encourage folks to follow one *or* the 
other exclusively.

Cheers

Mark

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list