From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1H2Wrc-0005xh-9l for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2007 17:58:52 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id l04HuSli013681; Thu, 4 Jan 2007 17:56:28 GMT Received: from serverkommune.de (serverkommune.de [88.198.12.136]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l04HruhO012109 for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2007 17:53:56 GMT Received: (qmail 12313 invoked by uid 89); 4 Jan 2007 18:47:16 +0100 Received: from p54a076ec.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO ?10.0.23.1?) (trauma@serverkommune.de@84.160.118.236) by serverkommune.de with ESMTPA; 4 Jan 2007 18:47:16 +0100 Message-ID: <459D3E8F.4040206@digital-trauma.de> Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 18:51:11 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?VGhvbWFzIFLDtnNuZXI=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.8.0.8) Gecko/20061114 SeaMonkey/1.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: Mailing Lists [Was: [gentoo-user] wrong subscription] References: <200701021855.43499.uwix@iway.na> <459CD671.2080103@digital-trauma.de> <200701042037.47144.crayon.shin.chan.uk@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200701042037.47144.crayon.shin.chan.uk@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 OpenPGP: id=1ACEC659 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id l04HuSmD013681 X-Archives-Salt: cd5be04d-b67c-448c-94f4-8012220b1dc1 X-Archives-Hash: 0ffbb497c2f3894ca31bfdb17b45d58d Crayon wrote: > On Thursday 04 January 2007 18:26, Thomas R=C3=B6sner wrote: > > =20 >> BTW, how/why was an ezmlm-clone chosen over Mailman for the gentoo >> lists? Performance?=20 >> =20 > > Possibly because mailman has had a fair number of security issues over = the=20 > years whereas qmail/ezmlm had practically none. > =20 Well, Mailman has a Webfrontend, but you don't actually have to make it=20 publically available. >> I wonder everytime I see a "unsubscribe"-Message on=20 >> the lists. >> =20 > > Those are from dozos who thinks they're on a majordomo managed list :) > =20 Mailman blocks them per default. Regards, T. --=20 gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list