public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [gentoo-user] Seamonkey blocking mozilla and the mozilla blocking seamonkey
  2006-12-08 11:08 [gentoo-user] Seamonkey blocking mozilla and the mozilla blocking seamonkey Jacob Klitmøller
@ 2006-07-13 10:17 ` Jules Colding
  2006-12-08 11:23   ` Jacob Klitmøller
  2006-07-13 13:32 ` William Kenworthy
  2006-11-01 22:03 ` Tim Igoe
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jules Colding @ 2006-07-13 10:17 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 12:08 +0100, Jacob Klitmøller wrote:
> Hi
> 
> Since Gnome 2.14 is marked stable I thought to upgrade :-)
> 
> However when I try to emerge gnome I get
> 
> [blocks B     ] www-client/seamonkey (is blocking www-client/mozilla-1.7.13)
> 
> or the other way around (mozilla blocking seamonkey) - trying to /etc
> /portage/package.mask is of no use since both is required. I have also
> tried fiddeling fith USE, but with no luck.
> 
> How do I resolve this and get gnome 2.14 emerged?

I got around it by un-merging mozilla, adding the "firefox" USE flags
and then emerging seamonkey.

-- 
  jules



-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] Seamonkey blocking mozilla and the mozilla blocking seamonkey
  2006-12-08 11:08 [gentoo-user] Seamonkey blocking mozilla and the mozilla blocking seamonkey Jacob Klitmøller
  2006-07-13 10:17 ` Jules Colding
@ 2006-07-13 13:32 ` William Kenworthy
  2006-07-13 13:43   ` Alexander Skwar
                     ` (2 more replies)
  2006-11-01 22:03 ` Tim Igoe
  2 siblings, 3 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: William Kenworthy @ 2006-07-13 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

If 2.14 is stable, why do I get:

rattus ~ # emerge gnome -vp

These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild   R   ] gnome-base/gnome-2.12.3  USE="cdr dvdr hal
-accessibility" 0 kB

Total size of downloads: 0 kB

synced yesterday.

BillK



On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 12:08 +0100, Jacob Klitmøller wrote:
> Hi
> 
> Since Gnome 2.14 is marked stable I thought to upgrade :-)
> 

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] Seamonkey blocking mozilla and the mozilla blocking seamonkey
  2006-07-13 13:32 ` William Kenworthy
@ 2006-07-13 13:43   ` Alexander Skwar
  2006-07-13 13:52     ` William Kenworthy
  2006-07-13 13:45   ` Alexander Skwar
  2006-07-13 14:06   ` Alexander Skwar
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Skwar @ 2006-07-13 13:43 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

William Kenworthy wrote:
> If 2.14 is stable, why do I get:
> 
> rattus ~ # emerge gnome -vp
> 
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
> 
> Calculating dependencies... done!
> [ebuild   R   ] gnome-base/gnome-2.12.3  USE="cdr dvdr hal
> -accessibility" 0 kB

Maybe an old profile? Where does /etc/make.profile point to?

Alexander Skwar
-- 
Mal: "Listen, if you got guests, I can come back later."
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] Seamonkey blocking mozilla and the mozilla blocking seamonkey
  2006-07-13 13:32 ` William Kenworthy
  2006-07-13 13:43   ` Alexander Skwar
@ 2006-07-13 13:45   ` Alexander Skwar
  2006-07-13 13:54     ` William Kenworthy
  2006-07-13 14:06   ` Alexander Skwar
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Skwar @ 2006-07-13 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

William Kenworthy wrote:
> If 2.14 is stable, why do I get:
> 
> rattus ~ # emerge gnome -vp
> 
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
> 
> Calculating dependencies... done!
> [ebuild   R   ] gnome-base/gnome-2.12.3  USE="cdr dvdr hal
> -accessibility" 0 kB

But it's more probable, that you forgot to mention one very important
thing... One which arch are you? gnome is stable on the arch, that still
most of the people use: i386. So, if you're on something different, you
should say so.

Alexander Skwar
-- 
Mal: "Listen, if you got guests, I can come back later."
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] Seamonkey blocking mozilla and the mozilla blocking seamonkey
  2006-07-13 13:43   ` Alexander Skwar
@ 2006-07-13 13:52     ` William Kenworthy
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: William Kenworthy @ 2006-07-13 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 15:43 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> William Kenworthy wrote:
> > If 2.14 is stable, why do I get:
> > 
...
> Alexander Skwar
> -- 
rattus ~ # ls -al /etc/make.profile
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 48 2006-03-12 22:17 /etc/make.profile
-> ../usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2006.0
rattus ~ #

checked 3 machines - all the same (though one is the master for syncing
so I would expect them to be the same!)


-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] Seamonkey blocking mozilla and the mozilla blocking seamonkey
  2006-07-13 13:45   ` Alexander Skwar
@ 2006-07-13 13:54     ` William Kenworthy
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: William Kenworthy @ 2006-07-13 13:54 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 15:45 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> William Kenworthy wrote:
> > If 2.14 is stable, why do I get:
> > 
> > rattus ~ # emerge gnome -vp
> > 
> > These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
> > 
> > Calculating dependencies... done!
> > [ebuild   R   ] gnome-base/gnome-2.12.3  USE="cdr dvdr hal
> > -accessibility" 0 kB
> 
> But it's more probable, that you forgot to mention one very important
> thing... One which arch are you? gnome is stable on the arch, that still
> most of the people use: i386. So, if you're on something different, you
> should say so.
> 
> Alexander Skwar
> -- 
> Mal: "Listen, if you got guests, I can come back later."

all are either intel or amd 
CHOST=i686-pc-linux-gnu

-- 
William Kenworthy <billk@iinet.net.au>
Home!
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] Seamonkey blocking mozilla and the mozilla blocking seamonkey
  2006-07-13 13:32 ` William Kenworthy
  2006-07-13 13:43   ` Alexander Skwar
  2006-07-13 13:45   ` Alexander Skwar
@ 2006-07-13 14:06   ` Alexander Skwar
  2006-07-14  1:49     ` W.Kenworthy
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Skwar @ 2006-07-13 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

William Kenworthy wrote:

> synced yesterday.

That might be the problem. It went stable yesterday, see
http://packages.gentoo.org/ebuilds/?gnome-2.14.2

Alexander Skwar
-- 
To get back on your feet, miss two car payments.
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] Seamonkey blocking mozilla and the mozilla blocking seamonkey
  2006-07-13 14:06   ` Alexander Skwar
@ 2006-07-14  1:49     ` W.Kenworthy
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: W.Kenworthy @ 2006-07-14  1:49 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

Yep, thats it.  A sync this morning and its available - must have missed
it by only a short time with the previous sync!

I have been waiting for this to appear, and seeing someone ask that it
had been stable, I assumed that it had been out awhile and I was missing
out on the good stuff :)

BillK


On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 16:06 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] Seamonkey blocking mozilla and the mozilla blocking seamonkey
  2006-12-08 11:08 [gentoo-user] Seamonkey blocking mozilla and the mozilla blocking seamonkey Jacob Klitmøller
  2006-07-13 10:17 ` Jules Colding
  2006-07-13 13:32 ` William Kenworthy
@ 2006-11-01 22:03 ` Tim Igoe
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Tim Igoe @ 2006-11-01 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1156 bytes --]

Jacob Klitmøller wrote:
> Hi
>
> Since Gnome 2.14 is marked stable I thought to upgrade :-)
>
> However when I try to emerge gnome I get
>
> [blocks B     ] www-client/seamonkey (is blocking www-client/mozilla-1.7.13)
>
> or the other way around (mozilla blocking seamonkey) - trying to /etc
> /portage/package.mask is of no use since both is required. I have also
> tried fiddeling fith USE, but with no luck.
>
> How do I resolve this and get gnome 2.14 emerged?
>
> Thanks
>
> Jacob
>   
Use emerge -uDpt to give a tree so you can see what package is pulling
in mozilla.

Mozilla has become Seamonkey, it might be that you need to remove
Mozilla to allow the updated ebuild (and name change) to take effect.

I have noticed there is one package (gtk-sharp i think) that still
depends on Mozilla instead of Seamonkey, I have just created a temp
ebuild, a copy of the original with the mozilla to seamonkey change and
stuck it in my overlay.

Hope that helps

-- 
Tim Igoe
http://tim.igoe.me.uk - Personal Site
http://tv.igoe.me.uk - UK TV Guide

"Computers are like Air-con, open windows and they stop working!"



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [gentoo-user] Seamonkey blocking mozilla and the mozilla blocking seamonkey
@ 2006-12-08 11:08 Jacob Klitmøller
  2006-07-13 10:17 ` Jules Colding
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jacob Klitmøller @ 2006-12-08 11:08 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

Hi

Since Gnome 2.14 is marked stable I thought to upgrade :-)

However when I try to emerge gnome I get

[blocks B     ] www-client/seamonkey (is blocking www-client/mozilla-1.7.13)

or the other way around (mozilla blocking seamonkey) - trying to /etc
/portage/package.mask is of no use since both is required. I have also
tried fiddeling fith USE, but with no luck.

How do I resolve this and get gnome 2.14 emerged?

Thanks

Jacob
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] Seamonkey blocking mozilla and the mozilla blocking seamonkey
  2006-07-13 10:17 ` Jules Colding
@ 2006-12-08 11:23   ` Jacob Klitmøller
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jacob Klitmøller @ 2006-12-08 11:23 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

Hi Jules

Thank you very much - that did the trick.

R.

Jacob

Jules Colding wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 12:08 +0100, Jacob Klitmøller wrote:
>   
>> Hi
>>
>> Since Gnome 2.14 is marked stable I thought to upgrade :-)
>>
>> However when I try to emerge gnome I get
>>
>> [blocks B     ] www-client/seamonkey (is blocking www-client/mozilla-1.7.13)
>>
>> or the other way around (mozilla blocking seamonkey) - trying to /etc
>> /portage/package.mask is of no use since both is required. I have also
>> tried fiddeling fith USE, but with no luck.
>>
>> How do I resolve this and get gnome 2.14 emerged?
>>     
>
> I got around it by un-merging mozilla, adding the "firefox" USE flags
> and then emerging seamonkey.
>
>   
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2006-11-01 22:08 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-12-08 11:08 [gentoo-user] Seamonkey blocking mozilla and the mozilla blocking seamonkey Jacob Klitmøller
2006-07-13 10:17 ` Jules Colding
2006-12-08 11:23   ` Jacob Klitmøller
2006-07-13 13:32 ` William Kenworthy
2006-07-13 13:43   ` Alexander Skwar
2006-07-13 13:52     ` William Kenworthy
2006-07-13 13:45   ` Alexander Skwar
2006-07-13 13:54     ` William Kenworthy
2006-07-13 14:06   ` Alexander Skwar
2006-07-14  1:49     ` W.Kenworthy
2006-11-01 22:03 ` Tim Igoe

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox