From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QrDqf-0002i1-Ht for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 18:49:49 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3230E21C210; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 18:49:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpq4.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net (smtpq4.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net [212.54.34.167]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43CE621C097 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 18:48:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.54.34.149] (helo=smtp17.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net) by smtpq4.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QrDpg-0001ba-JM for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 20:48:48 +0200 Received: from 5ed027a1.cm-7-1a.dynamic.ziggo.nl ([94.208.39.161] helo=data.antarean.org) by smtp17.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QrDpf-0007UG-SW for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 20:48:47 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by data.antarean.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11B33CF1 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 20:52:00 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at antarean.org Received: from data.antarean.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (data.antarean.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C+hLtI6sm+OK for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 20:51:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eve.localnet (eve.lan.antarean.org [10.20.13.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by data.antarean.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76CB570E for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 20:51:59 +0200 (CEST) From: Joost Roeleveld To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Which gcc unstable? Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 20:48:46 +0200 Message-ID: <4562529.VSJyiXps7N@eve> User-Agent: KMail/4.7.0 (Linux/2.6.36-gentoo-r5; KDE/4.7.0; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <4E42C971.6050107@gmail.com> References: <4E42C67B.1050909@gmail.com> <4E42C971.6050107@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-ID: 1QrDpf-0007UG-SW X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-SpamCheck: geen spam, SpamAssassin (niet cached, score=-0.33, vereist 5, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_05 -0.50, RDNS_DYNAMIC 0.98, RP_MATCHES_RCVD -0.81) X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-From: joost@antarean.org X-Spam-Status: No X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: d7d3cd9e030c2bd9bf09a4226bbb55a4 On Wednesday, August 10, 2011 01:09:53 PM Dale wrote: > Dale wrote: > > I did upgrade it a while back. I'll check and see if there is a new > > one now. I hadn't thought of that before. We all know that a update > > fixes some bugs but introduces several new ones. lol Reminds me of > > Raid. Kill some but new babies come out a few days later. New bugs > > but still problems. :/ > > > > Thanks much. Great hunch. > > > > Dale > > > > :-) :-) > > OK. Here is a linky: > > http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=3320&dl=1#bios > > There is a update but I don't think it is something I should need. It > has a brief description of what is changed. Does anyone think I should > update this anyway? They always say not to upgrade unless it is going > to fix something since it can break things. I'm on F4 now by the way. > The F5A would be the new one. > > Thoughts? Yeps or nopes would be great. Alan, Neil and other gurus. > > Dale > > :-) :-) Comment 2 "Update CPU AGESA code" might help. You'd need to google for what AGESA means. (Not done this yet) Comment 1, however, "Beta BIOS" makes me think you might not want to try it. Beta is generally, testing, it might break things. Am surprised they put a Beta up though. -- Joost