From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QSTMY-0007ni-Ku for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 12:20:26 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B7C671C084; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 12:18:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-fx0-f53.google.com (mail-fx0-f53.google.com [209.85.161.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EF0E1C084 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 12:18:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm8 with SMTP id 8so1650625fxm.40 for ; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 05:18:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=CgFjcP3Rg5MbTkVYBVdEKioKLgv2D61udlE1QSTfWNA=; b=LMYVI1gUlS66MJzZnsckt6hwYXY6MC2kOWWfIHE9/w0dOZT/2mP2yx62wyij+TSoGh +/Px/Wn2sSAc1oj4SEfUF96h2t6pWFk9T441QDwjCc3J7SSP0I3esjt8fZYhDm/z5TLi 5jl/hsprlHVY8Oh3w1JUyZjSi/MbZ6t6U+2U4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; b=Evre1s2ZNyoCEAC/o91SDL67AQsp2pK5Ji4SRU93Q6j6QZuutHi9VVTGau+L5K31zB LYsf05/4TgEYs0AcNflviGfmY3Xf89B+QxJqsGtAljlh7tWDk4TwamOX5pbZrq4OsfpT A2tzvpZJBgPNav1+re2lxkekE0bbbB/eXQ+KU= Received: by 10.223.61.82 with SMTP id s18mr843976fah.44.1307103513459; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 05:18:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localnet (p4FC74876.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.199.72.118]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g8sm480339fai.44.2011.06.03.05.18.32 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 03 Jun 2011 05:18:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Volker Armin Hemmann To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] autofs Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 14:18:25 +0200 Message-ID: <4541232.ejeL7krNmS@localhost> User-Agent: KMail/4.6 rc1 (Linux/2.6.39; KDE/4.6.3; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <201106031337.54808.stephane@22decembre.eu> References: <201106031244.57456.stephane@22decembre.eu> <201106031255.58612.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> <201106031337.54808.stephane@22decembre.eu> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 2afc58c732156f2eb4aa8330b44c32ba On Friday 03 June 2011 13:37:54 St=E9phane Guedon wrote: > On Friday 03 June 2011 12:55:58 Alan McKinnon wrote: > > Apparently, though unproven, at 12:44 on Friday 03 June 2011, St=E9= phane > > Guedon > >=20 > > did opine thusly: > > > anyone use autofs to manage mounting of nfs on a laptop ? > >=20 > > Is this mounting a share from an nfs server onto a laptop? > >=20 > > > Is it fluent, > > > easy to use ? > >=20 > > It's NFS. The words "nfs" and "fluent, easy to use" do not belong i= n the > > same sentence unless there's a "not" in the middle. > >=20 > > The point is that NFS was not designed with laptops and other devic= es > > that can be disconnected in mind. It was designed for secure LANs t= hat > > do not change much, and laptops present issues that are not easy to= > > solve. > >=20 > > > How many shares maximum ? > >=20 > > From a server? Hundreds, with ease. NFS is not the bottleneck, your= > > shares are limited by how much bandwidth you have over the network.= >=20 > Ok, it's a beginning.. :-) thank you ! >=20 > Nfs hasn't been designed for laptop, it's ok. But, appart from coda (= which > has a file size limit of 1 giga, so, useless in home networking), I k= now > nothing that is fit for network file-sharing for laptop (the laptop i= sn't > the server of course). >=20 > I search a solution for that since years ! samba?