From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Gc63y-0004nS-FI for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 20:06:22 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k9NK3l32029717; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 20:03:47 GMT Received: from imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net (imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.68]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k9NJxg4k001444 for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 19:59:43 GMT Received: from ibm64aec.bellsouth.net ([65.12.210.216]) by imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20061023195941.BZLH22356.imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm64aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 15:59:41 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.4] (really [65.12.210.216]) by ibm64aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20061023195941.YZQO17329.ibm64aec.bellsouth.net@[192.168.0.4]> for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 15:59:41 -0400 Message-ID: <453C7664.6060903@bellsouth.net> Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 03:59:32 -0400 From: david User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060623) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] xmms alternative References: <20061023080808.0e31ed69@katana.armory.no-ip.org> <20061023151311.7a11ce89@lx-arnau.pic.es> In-Reply-To: <20061023151311.7a11ce89@lx-arnau.pic.es> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: e73f08c4-2215-466a-8e5b-2e67275a83e8 X-Archives-Hash: de2e6c3952c30e3804d85020dd47f65e Arnau Bria wrote: > On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 08:08:08 -0400 > Dave V wrote: > > >> Hello, >> > Hi, > > >> I just read on the gentoo-dev list that xmms is about to be removed, >> but it's probably the only sound player that I've used. Could someone >> recommend a good alternative. I'm rather surprised that no one wanted >> to maintain the packages. >> > > you should, not should, you MUST use Amarok :-) > > Cheers! > I started using audacious, about the same. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list