From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GZTnc-0001Ma-EB for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 14:50:41 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k9GElvNx016846; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 14:47:57 GMT Received: from fire-eyes.org (adsl-68-250-9-164.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net [68.250.9.164]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k9GEjiuP029120 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 14:45:45 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.2] (helo=[0.0.0.0]) by fire-eyes.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GZTio-0002OQ-6N for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 10:45:44 -0400 Message-ID: <45339B16.4020906@fire-eyes.org> Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 10:45:42 -0400 From: fire-eyes User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060927) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] xorg 7.1 radeon hardware acceleration? x300 (M22 [Radeon Mobility M300]) References: <4532B005.8040204@fire-eyes.org> <200610160906.29634.alan@linuxholdings.co.za> <45338E0E.7000306@fire-eyes.org> <200610161635.54269.alan@linuxholdings.co.za> In-Reply-To: <200610161635.54269.alan@linuxholdings.co.za> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "fire-eyes", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Monday 16 October 2006 15:50, fire-eyes wrote: >> Using a IBM (yes, it says IBM on it ;p) Thinkpad T43. As for the >> closed drivers, I have zero intentions of touching them again anytime >> soon, those things regularly lock my system up so hard i've had >> severe filesystem damage. I have heard the same from more than one >> thinkpad T43 owner unfortunately, it's just not worth the hassle. > > Ah, the T43. Yes, that does change everything and yes, I fully agree > that you should not use fglrx on that machine. > > Got any coding skills? Looks like you have a personal itch :-) [...] Content analysis details: (-1.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.4 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP X-Archives-Salt: 41cf8379-28d1-4c4c-b4f2-6734841cf213 X-Archives-Hash: 2779ef94c4b2b8397678891fb52254f3 Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Monday 16 October 2006 15:50, fire-eyes wrote: >> Using a IBM (yes, it says IBM on it ;p) Thinkpad T43. As for the >> closed drivers, I have zero intentions of touching them again anytime >> soon, those things regularly lock my system up so hard i've had >> severe filesystem damage. I have heard the same from more than one >> thinkpad T43 owner unfortunately, it's just not worth the hassle. > > Ah, the T43. Yes, that does change everything and yes, I fully agree > that you should not use fglrx on that machine. > > Got any coding skills? Looks like you have a personal itch :-) Nope. > alan -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list