From: Daniel Pielmeier <daniel.pielmeier@googlemail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] "emerge -pvuND world" versus "emerge -pveuND world"
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 21:31:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <452D4696.7000107@googlemail.com> (raw)
Hi,
I recognized this some time ago!
When my system is up to date "emerge -pvuND world" shows me:
> emerge -pvuND world
>
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>
> Calculating world dependencies... done!
>
> Total size of downloads: 0 kB
Which is normal because an up to date system doesn't have to download
anything. But when i add the emptytree option "emerge -pveuND world" i
get this (output reduced):
> emerge -pveuND world
>
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>
> ...
> Calculating world dependencies ..... ....... done!
> [ebuild N ] sys-devel/binutils [2.16.1-r3] USE="nls
> -multislot -multitarget -test -vanilla" 109 kB
> ...
> [ebuild N ] net-dialup/ppp [2.4.3-r16] USE="gtk ipv6
> pam -activefilter -atm -dhcp -eap-tls -mppe-mppc -radius" 55 kB
> ...
>
> Total size of downloads: 164 kB
So why are there appearing some apps now for which portage has to
download something? Using eix on sys-devel/binutils and net-dialup/ppp
tells me that i have exactly those ebuilds listed above installed.
I think that there have been made changes to this ebuild without
increasing the version number. For example binutils from 2.16.1-r3 to
2.16.1-r4. So portage doesn't upgrade this package although there have
been changes. Or is there a portage option i don't know until now which
i have to use for getting this apps updated. Am i guessing right in any
of this cases or is this another problem with portage?
Thanks in advance,
Daniel
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
next reply other threads:[~2006-10-11 19:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-11 19:31 Daniel Pielmeier [this message]
2006-10-11 19:51 ` [gentoo-user] "emerge -pvuND world" versus "emerge -pveuND world" Boris Fersing
2006-10-11 20:10 ` Trey Gruel
2006-10-11 21:33 ` Daniel Pielmeier
2006-10-11 22:02 ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=452D4696.7000107@googlemail.com \
--to=daniel.pielmeier@googlemail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox