public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-user] nftables, ip[6]tables and network namespaces
@ 2014-03-05  6:31 Pavel Volkov
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Pavel Volkov @ 2014-03-05  6:31 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

I have 2 questions about the new nftables in kernel 3.13.

1. Are network namespaces not yet supported in nftables? When I load a set of 
rules in another namespace with nftables, it affects the default namespace 
instead.
The same thing worked perfectly with iptables/ip6tables.

2. What takes priority, nftables or iptables? If there's a rule math in one 
implementation, will there be processed?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2014-03-05  6:32 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-03-05  6:31 [gentoo-user] nftables, ip[6]tables and network namespaces Pavel Volkov

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox