From: Pavel Volkov <negaipub@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] nftables, ip[6]tables and network namespaces
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 10:31:49 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4512485.C407EoxT6b@melforce> (raw)
I have 2 questions about the new nftables in kernel 3.13.
1. Are network namespaces not yet supported in nftables? When I load a set of
rules in another namespace with nftables, it affects the default namespace
instead.
The same thing worked perfectly with iptables/ip6tables.
2. What takes priority, nftables or iptables? If there's a rule math in one
implementation, will there be processed?
reply other threads:[~2014-03-05 6:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4512485.C407EoxT6b@melforce \
--to=negaipub@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox