From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GOUxh-0004uX-O0 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 16 Sep 2006 07:51:42 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k8G7oY7E018294; Sat, 16 Sep 2006 07:50:34 GMT Received: from mxo3.broadbandsupport.net (mxo3.broadbandsupport.net [209.55.3.83]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8G7kNfx000719 for ; Sat, 16 Sep 2006 07:46:24 GMT Received: from [192.168.100.4] (host-207-68-225-84.vista-express.com [207.68.225.84]) by mxo3.broadbandsupport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72BB6C0D53 for ; Sat, 16 Sep 2006 03:46:17 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <450BABC9.9020704@vista-express.com> Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 02:46:17 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.5) Gecko/20060906 SeaMonkey/1.0.3 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Compiles failing because of doc in USE line. References: <450BA9B5.7020502@vista-express.com> In-Reply-To: <450BA9B5.7020502@vista-express.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-broadbandsupport-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-broadbandsupport-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-broadbandsupport-MailScanner-From: teendale@vista-express.com X-Spam-Status: No X-Archives-Salt: 8f9a9e17-de8d-4c38-8c41-6dd560685f30 X-Archives-Hash: 83bec5d0f1454c86241bc438fb020287 Dale wrote: > Hi, > > I'm doing a install on another drive via chroot. I had > gnome-base/gnome-libs-1.4.2 to fail with errors similiar to this: > > > <<<<<<< SNIP >>>>>>>> > > Is something broke or am I missing something? It acts like it missed a > dependancy or something but I fixed anything that failed to compile. I > also re-emerged several sgml packages with no change. > > Any ideas?? > > Thanks > > Dale > > :-) :-) > > I found this: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146927 It looks like the same thing. What you folks think?? I need to fix this if someone has a way, other than removing all the docs of course. Dale :-) :-) -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list