From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GN1V2-0003hf-Ih for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 12 Sep 2006 06:12:00 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k8C6ARXq028413; Tue, 12 Sep 2006 06:10:27 GMT Received: from mxo5.broadbandsupport.net (mxo5.broadbandsupport.net [209.55.3.85]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8C64FTY029547 for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2006 06:04:15 GMT Received: from [192.168.100.4] (host-207-68-225-84.vista-express.com [207.68.225.84]) by mxo5.broadbandsupport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91A93C1B6B for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2006 02:04:06 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <45064DD6.3070605@vista-express.com> Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 01:04:06 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.5) Gecko/20060906 SeaMonkey/1.0.3 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gcc upgrade from 3.x to 4.x, when should I run revdep-rebuild? References: <200609090459.16850.bo.andresen@zlin.dk> <45023601.4030508@vista-express.com> <200609090555.32117.bo.andresen@zlin.dk> <45023FCD.1040609@vista-express.com> <20060911223259.27bbb717@hactar.digimed.co.uk> <45062B5E.2030507@vista-express.com> <450637C6.7070904@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <450637C6.7070904@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-broadbandsupport-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-broadbandsupport-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-broadbandsupport-MailScanner-From: teendale@vista-express.com X-Spam-Status: No X-Archives-Salt: af7d2c2a-face-4cf7-9fae-6f370b86d13a X-Archives-Hash: f8d981bf6a0c31180bdd36b802301809 Ryan Tandy wrote: > Dale wrote: >> Cheese, I'm learning something. I already knew that it would not delete >> files in /etc/ and now I know why. LOL I never put the two together >> before you said that. > > Well, the /etc thing is generally more due to CONFIG_PROTECT - it > won't delete files from /etc regardless of whether or not you've > modified them, because they're under CONFIG_PROTECTion. Yea, but now I know that. Sometimes it takes my light bulb a while to get brightened up good. :-( LOL Dale :-) :-) -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list