From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GJ67B-0002In-Tt for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2006 10:19:10 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k81AH5iL005595; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 10:17:05 GMT Received: from swip.net (mailfe08.swip.net [212.247.154.225]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k81AD7dj014560 for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 10:13:07 GMT X-T2-Posting-ID: xM5+dyx+bA+XkPEuvlDX1Q== X-Cloudmark-Score: 0.000000 [] Received: from [213.100.41.17] (HELO [192.168.0.16]) by mailfe08.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.8) with ESMTP id 267705684 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2006 12:13:07 +0200 Message-ID: <44F807E3.4070406@home.se> Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 12:13:55 +0200 From: Erik User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060806) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Dash as /bin/sh? References: <2102237.F9AAudgNz4@work.message-center.info> In-Reply-To: <2102237.F9AAudgNz4@work.message-center.info> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: be1611a8-451a-427f-8573-764aff2bc7e5 X-Archives-Hash: fab8d3685ea0e482bca0e329e0cb1a46 Alexander Skwar wrote: > The Ubuntu folks report on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DashAsBinSh, that > bootup and also ./configure runs are *WAY* faster if "dash" is used > as /bin/sh instead of bash. > > Did anyone try this out on Gentoo? Are the boot scripts from Gentoo > strictly POSIX compliant? I tried "time configure" in gnuplot several times for each shell and took the fastest time. shell real user sys bash 0m11.924s 0m6.848s 0m2.980s dash 0m11.822s 0m6.888s 0m2.816s static dash 0m11.977s 0m6.804s 0m3.064s dash would be 0,9% faster, which is not statistically significant when measuring like this. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list